Third Party & Independents Archives

Coming to a (War) Theater in 2013

This is how it happens.  No one wants war, especially world wars that engulf the entire planet in the disputes that are usually idiotic.  But it appears that another of these situations is coming to the Pacific Ocean, involving Japan, China and the United States.  Once these three get involved, more are sure to follow.  The worst part is that there really appears to be no way out.  With the current administration having no block to endless war now that the anti-war progressives are on board with wars they start and this one being made more difficult because of this administration’s actions, it really does appear to be just a matter of time.

The details:

There are some rocks in the Pacific Ocean that Japan calls the Senkakus Islands and China has dubbed the Diaoyu Islands.  Both are claiming them as their own.  In recent months, more and more military posturing over the uninhabited lands has taken place.  Japan and China have both been flying planes over the islands.  There is hope that this can be stopped before it goes any further.  This is, however, unlikely to happen.  This is, after all, how wars get started.

It seems almost laughably unthinkable that the world's three richest countries - two of them nuclear-armed - would go to war over something so trivial. But that is to confuse what starts a war with what causes it. The Greek historian Thucydides first explained the difference almost 2500 years ago. He wrote that the catastrophic Peloponnesian War started from a spat between Athens and one of Sparta's allies over a relatively insignificant dispute. But what caused the war was something much graver: the growing wealth and power of Athens, and the fear this caused in Sparta.

The analogy with Asia today is uncomfortably close and not at all reassuring. No one in 431BC really wanted a war, but when Athens threatened one of Sparta's allies over a disputed colony, the Spartans felt they had to intervene. They feared that to step back in the face of Athens' growing power would fatally compromise Sparta's position in the Greek world, and concede supremacy to Athens.

The Senkakus issue is likewise a symptom of tensions whose cause lies elsewhere, in China's growing challenge to America's long-standing leadership in Asia, and America's response. In the past few years China has become both markedly stronger and notably more assertive. America has countered with the strategic pivot to Asia. Now, China is pushing back against President Barack Obama's pivot by targeting Japan in the Senkakus.

The Japanese themselves genuinely fear that China will become even more overbearing as its strength grows, and they depend on America to protect them. But they also worry whether they can rely on Washington as China becomes more formidable. China's ratcheting pressure over the Senkakus strikes at both these anxieties.

And why can't we just stop this nonsense?

These mutual misconceptions carry the seeds of a terrible miscalculation, as each side underestimates how much is at stake for the other. For Japan, bowing to Chinese pressure would feel like acknowledging China's right to push them around, and accepting that America can't help them. For Washington, not supporting Tokyo would not only fatally damage the alliance with Japan, it would amount to an acknowledgment America is no longer Asia's leading power, and that the ''pivot'' is just posturing. And for Beijing, a backdown would mean that instead of proving its growing power, its foray into the Senkakus would simply have demonstrated America's continued primacy. So for all of them, the largest issues of power and status are at stake. These are exactly the kind of issues that great powers have often gone to war over.

And it gets worse.  Already five countries are now claiming ownership of the islands.  The Philippines have moved people onto the island they call Thitu Island.  It appears that the area is rich in oil and gas reserves.

And today, China has sent its newest warship to the region.

The Taiwan-owned China Times reports the Liuzhou Type 054A warship entered the South China Sea Fleet of China's PLA Navy, making it the sixth 054 warship in the area.

Though the Type 054A is not a new design, this most recently commissioned vessel will have the latest technological advantages

Happy New Year, and may peace be with us all.

Posted by Rhinehold at December 31, 2012 5:12 PM
Comments
Comment #359672

Rhinehold, that is a scary but very real possibility. Our top military brass seem to be mere political hacks now days so I wouldn’t trust them to win a war if one came.

Posted by: Royal Flush at December 31, 2012 6:37 PM
Comment #359675

Rhinehold, what about the ‘peace initiative’? Is all that we gave up under ‘globalisation’ for naught? Are we not entertwined, economically, with the nations of the world so as one country can’t break the financial bonds that bind?

How could China fight a war if they lost the US and EU as trading buddies? Would not the Asia rim, PI, Taiwan, Japan, India and so on be up in arms if China tried to go ‘ballistic’? Plus, we owe them near $3T.

I think China, and more recently, Russia placed themselves in bondage before the ink was dry on the WTO signing. The issue does represent a great chance to push ‘one world’ as a settlement forum.


Posted by: Roy Ellis at December 31, 2012 7:38 PM
Comment #359677

What really makes me sick is that we are helping to fund Chinas’ military while congress digs us deeper into debt with their out of control spending. The entitlement class in this country that votes for those who promise the most shit will eventually bring us down. Happy New Year to you all as well.

Posted by: dbs at December 31, 2012 8:24 PM
Comment #359688

We have to go to war with China. That way we can default on what we owe them and get by with it. What’s a few thousand of our kids lives compared to the billions we’ll save not paying China. Then Obama and crew can waste that on stimulus packages for their cronies.

Posted by: Ron Brown at January 1, 2013 8:54 AM
Comment #359761

4 Things You Need to Know About Secretary of State Nominee John Kerry - Don’t let his reputation as a peacenik fool you. John Kerry is no anti-interventionist.

http://reason.com/archives/2013/01/03/5-things-to-consider-about-secretary-of

Unfortunately, this just adds fuel to the fire, as it were. Dems love THEIR wars…

Posted by: Rhinehold at January 3, 2013 12:38 PM
Comment #359907

“Dems love THEIR wars…”

Except when republicans are waging them. I have noticed all the anti war protestors seem to be MIA the last 4 years. hmmm ?

Posted by: dbs at January 4, 2013 5:10 AM
Post a comment