Third Party & Independents Archives

Federal vs. State Policy Failing Gay Marriage

As if the government system isn’t messed up enough as it is, now we add same-sex marriage to the cluster. Two women met in college, fell in love, and then they got married. One of the women is Pakistani, and now that her student visa is expiring she is facing deportation because the federal government does not recognize their marriage in Massachusetts.

The Pakistani woman, Gloria, is 24 years old and is now facing a very dangerous future if she returns to Pakistan. She refuses to share her last name because she is afraid for her safety. She says, "It's very unfair. It's unjust. It's almost to the point it's cruel," adding, "I feel much more American than Pakistani. Whatever I've built of my own identity is here. I've never experienced my own decision making there."

The Defense of Marriage Act was implemented in 1996, and only sponsors citizenship to an immigrant in a marriage between a man and a woman. Same-sex couples are excluded from this act even if they are legally married. The couple has sought the help of Senator John Kerry who has contacted the Department of Homeland Security and asked the case be delayed before any decision is made on Gloria's deportation.

When did America become a country where the government has become so deranged, it affects the freedom and safety of its own citizens? While trying to protect her identity, her safety is in jeopardy if she returns to Pakistan. Coming from a culture that views homosexuality as a crime, and particularly for a woman, Gloria is in a position where her life is on the line if she returns to Pakistan. To willingly subject someone to his or her own torture or murder is despicable. It really doesn't matter if you do or don't believe in gay marriage, but in a humane society we should knowingly subject this woman to torture.

Posted by MichaelMears at July 12, 2012 5:04 PM
Comments
Comment #348320

This is an interesting post MM.

“When did America become a country where the government has become so deranged, it affects the freedom and safety of its own citizens?”

Is this Pakistani woman a citizen of the US?

There are many liberal Judges in America who would like to include Islamic law in our court system. How would it go for homosexuals and gay marriage if this happened?

It kind of makes me glad to be an American.

Regarding the young lady; maybe she should have thought about this before?

Perhaps Obama could do the same thing for her as he did for his relatives; you know just throw the immigration laws and the Constitution in the old preverbal “shit can”

Posted by: Frank at July 12, 2012 10:46 PM
Comment #348326

So, Frank…. was your last comment made out of ignorance, or just a long-cultured hate of anyone not anglo-American??

Posted by: jane doe at July 13, 2012 1:41 AM
Comment #348327

Mears
I support gay-marriage. Not allowing gay-marriage isn’t a violation of rights and is not where near being the same as the struggle black folks went through in the past, as gay-marriage supports disgustingly claim, but I support being allowed to marry whoever you want.

Gloria knew how intolerant her country was. She knew her visa would expire. She knew her marriage would not be recognized by our federal government. She chose to marry another woman. She put herself in this position.

“To willingly subject someone to his or her own torture or murder is despicable”

This excuse could be used to justify never deporting any illegal alien.
Legislating by emotion does not work.

Posted by: kctim at July 13, 2012 9:28 AM
Comment #348360

“So, Frank…. was your last comment made out of ignorance, or just a long-cultured hate of anyone not anglo-American??”

Posted by: jane doe at July 13, 2012 1:41 AM

jane doe, as I explained to Adam Ducker in the 1st column, I am black. So I do not have a “long-cultured hate of anyone not anglo-American”.

But let me ask you jane, did Obama make a special attempt to keep his illegal relatives in the US?

“After two rare secret court hearings, President Obama’s illegal immigrant aunt has been granted political asylum by the same judge who deported her last spring after noting that she had previously ignored multiple removal orders.

The judge’s abrupt reversal will remain a mystery because it all took place behind closed doors, even though the Justice Department’s immigration court manual—as well as a federal appellate court—says such proceedings should be open. Yet the most “transparent administration in history” arranged for the deportation hearings to be held out of public view.

That’s probably because the commander-in-chief’s aunt, Zeituni Polly Onyango, has essentially flipped the finger at U.S. immigration laws for years, twice ignoring deportation orders (in 2003 and 2004) before getting busted again in 2008. Onyango has for years lived in a South Boston public housing facility and was denied yet another stay of deportation during her nephew’s presidential campaign.”

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2010/05/obama-s-illegal-immigrant-aunt-gets-asylum/

Posted by: Frank at July 13, 2012 10:30 AM
Comment #348362
There are many liberal Judges in America who would like to include Islamic law in our court system.

Name one

Posted by: Rhinehold at July 13, 2012 12:04 PM
Comment #348363

Frank,

“I am black. So I do not have a “long-cultured hate of anyone not anglo-American.”

Really, and merely being black precludes this sort of thing?

“But let me ask you jane, did Obama make a special attempt to keep his illegal relatives in the US?”

Interestingly enough, she can’t prove that he didn’t, and you can’t prove that he did.

It interests me that the fringers find it necessary to use wild speculation, rumor, and innuendo to insult Obama when there are more than a few legitimate things he has gotten wrong.

Rocky


Posted by: Rocky Marks at July 13, 2012 12:05 PM
Comment #348374

Frank…

1) Was a case on whether a ballot initiative was constitutional or not and the initiative said nothing about Sharia law. It had nothing at all do with instituting Sharia law on anyone who isn’t Islamic.

2) (I’m assuming the second link was a duplicate)

3) Was against a state constitutional amendment to block courts from using Sharia law when appropriate. The defendants could provide no evidence of it every being used and applied to non Muslims. Even further, the court was NOT liberal.

The Denver-based court, which is not known for holding progressive views, on Tuesday upheld a lower court injunction against the proposed amendment, which passed in 2010 by 70 percent of Oklahoma voters in a referendum. The court decision, sparked by a lawsuit brought by the Council on American-Islamic Relations, repudiated, in part, the fear of “creeping Sharia law” that has inspired over 20 proposed state laws and has infused some Republican campaign rhetoric.

“Appellants do not identify any actual problem the challenged amendment seeks to solve,” the three judge panel wrote. “Indeed, they admitted at the preliminary injunction hearing that they did not know of even a single instance where an Oklahoma court had applied Sharia law or used the legal precepts of other nations or cultures, let alone that such applications or uses had resulted in concrete problems in Oklahoma.”

4) Once again, nothing to do with forcing anyone to follow Sharia law, this was a case where people were upset about funds going to AIG, a private organization that is sympathetic to Sharia law. I suppose we should also block any federal funds going to any religious based organization that isn’t Islamic, right? I am all for that, but the courts found for all religious freedom, not specifically Islamic.

Sorry Frank, but you are actually going to have to read what was written in these ‘links’ (and please try to avoid using such moronic sources as Right Side News) if you are going to make your case. You have simply failed by not knowing the difference between defending religious freedom and violating it…

Posted by: Rhinehold at July 13, 2012 3:37 PM
Comment #348382

Wow, you’re really reaching, aren’t you Frank?

1) Was about someone responding to a religious incitement. It has nothing to do with Sharia law or considering foreign laws to determine guilt or innocence. If the person protesting was defecating on a bible and a devout Christian attempted to stop him, would you want him in jail for assault? Or would you be defending him?

The right to free speech does not assure that we won’t incite responses that are not welcome.

2) I was wondering if you would toss this one out. Had you actually done any research you would have seen two things. First, the decision was based on a contract between Muslims and their Mosque. This is no different than a lawsuit about the firings individuals working for the Catholic church because they were gay and the judge using the bible to determine the outcome. I am sure you would be on the other side of that battle if it were related to Christianity, right?

Nielsen limited his use of Islamic law to deciding whether arbitration by an Islamic scholar mediating a dispute between the mosque and ousted trustees followed the teachings of the Koran.

Oh, and the judge was a conservative appointed by Jeb Bush.

3) This is just the second one again, are you actually reading these?

4) This one is interesting but is not exactly as your link explains. The case was not in finding if the man raped his wife, it was a restraining order hearing. The judge did NOT find that the assaulter was not guilty of rape, only that his actions were not intended to be criminal and therefore the restraining order was not warranted. It did not use Sharia law to determine guilt or innocence.

And as should have happened, the case was reversed on appeal and the restraining order issued.

I’m sorry Frank, again you are going to have to do better. I would suggest starting by actually reading the cases in question before posting the links..

Posted by: Rhinehold at July 13, 2012 5:11 PM
Comment #348383

Oh, I forgot this quote…

Markus Wagner, a professor of international law at the University of Miami School of Law, said courts often refer to religious codes in arbitration cases.

If two sides in an arbitration, for example, agree to use Jewish law, then a judge could properly use the Talmud in deciding a case, Wagner said.

“On the legal side, it’s just not all that unusual,” he said.

Posted by: Rhinehold at July 13, 2012 5:47 PM
Comment #355208

It could have been much worse. An Coach Factory Outlet examination of the sabotage revealed why government officials Louis Vuitton Belts and computer experts found the attack disturbing.Aramco’s oil production Coach Factory Outlet operations are segregated from the company’s internal communications Gucci Belts network. Once executives were assured that only the internal communications network had Coach Factory Outlet been hit and that not a drop of oil had been spilled, they set to work Coach Factory Outlet replacing the hard drives of tens of thousands of its PCs and tracking Coach Factory Online down the parties responsible, according to two people close to the Coach Outlet Online investigation but who were not authorized to speak publicly about it.Aramco Coach Outlet Online flew in roughly a dozen American computer security experts. By Coach Online Outlet the time those specialists arrived, they already had a good handle on the Coach Factory Outlet Online virus. Within hours of the attack, researchers at Coach Outlet Online Symantec, a Silicon Valley security company, began analyzing a sample of Coach Outlet Online the virus.That virus called Shamoon after a word embedded in its code Coach Factory Outlet was designed to do two things: replace the data on hard drives with Hermes Belts an image of a burning American flag and report the addresses of infected computers Coach Outlet Online a bragging list of sorts back to a computer inside the company’s Coach Factory Online network.Shamoon’s code included a so-called kill switch, a timer Coach Factory Outlet set to attack at 11:08 a.m., the exact time that Aramco’s computers Hermes Belts were wiped of memory. Shamoon’s creators even gave the erasing mechanism a Coach Factory Online name: Wiper.Last May, researchers discovered that Flame had been siphoning data from computers, mainly in Iran, for several years.

Posted by: Gucci Belts at October 24, 2012 2:47 AM
Comment #355917

What, then, are the characteristics that make an MSA likely to spawn successful neologisms? It’s well established that Coach Outlet Twitter has a higher rate of adoption among African Americans than other ethnic groups, and so it perhaps isn’t Coach Outlet surprising that they now find that innovation centres, as well as being highly populated, have a higher proportion of Coach Outlet African Americans, and that similarity of racial demographic can make two urban centres more likely to be linked Coach Outlet in the influence network. There is a long history of adoption of African American slang (cool, dig, rip off) in mainstream Coach Outlet Online US culture, so these findings agree with what we might expect.Not only has he been sacked, but he now risks losing his Coach Factory Online home as well, situated almost next door to his former workplace, the Papal apartments on the top floor of the Coach Outlet Online Apostolic Palace.The Gendarmerie explained that this was done to prevent Gabriele from harming himself, Coach Outlet and that he himself had asked for the light to be left on at night and was given a sleeping mask.

Posted by: Coach Outlet at October 31, 2012 5:00 AM
Comment #357264

I want to examine most of the popular UGG Sale
mistakes we complete as well as how to rectify them to have a successful business on line. Plenty of people have UGG Boots taken action as well as started making capital online. It can simple and you could make currency UGG UK your hosiery ! The variety of ways to make money online? consist of selling your own personal merchandise, to promoting somebody else’s products and getting settled commission for doing Louis Vuitton Outlet this, anyone even can have got other people market your product and you simply pay them commission. One thing you need to get when you start your online Louis Vuitton UK marketing work is a bit with patience. At this point, affiliate marketing is one of widely used and possibly the simplest approach to earn online. Now you can in promoting other’s product so you earn the Louis Vuitton commission when a prospect will buy it inside internet connection. A few errors which you could be carrying out. So have earning money from home continue to keep operating. Almost all connected do write a lot however do not make use of search phrases. Merely putting up an online site on web server does not launch traffic upon itself. It really must be offered online to make sure that people might know of the presence. In promoting your internet-site you are able to follow several of the suggestions provided below. This will be done by writing and submitting articles and write it to varied web directories like Ezinearticles, Goarticles, Articlecity and many other. However be certain that virtually all content you write is original otherwise your content articles might be invalidated and you will probably get hold of no credit by search engines overly. This would create backlinks and generate traffic to your web site. Blog site commenting is indeed, ideal for promoting your online business on the web, Individuals of the testers underestimate it. Often leave a hyperlink to your website inside trademark. Most are most of the approaches you can count on take traffic to your site. However are numerous more this sort of ways.

Posted by: UGG at November 17, 2012 3:59 AM
Comment #359873

Easily packable Coach Factory Outlet the president’s majority shrank nationally, he won a larger proportion of Latino and Asian votes Gucci Belt than in 2008. Among Latinos, Mr. Romney’s share of the vote fell 17 percentage points below Coach Outlet Online the 44 percent won by George W. Bush in 2004. Perhaps most ominous, the Latino share of the Coach Online Outlet total vote rose to 10 percent from 8 percent in 2004, and the Asian share rose to 3 Coach Bags Outlet percent from 2 percent. The electorate is now 28 percent nonwhite, more than double the figure Coach Factory Online from two decades ago. That growth is certain to continue; in 2011, births to nonwhites Hermes Belt outnumbered births to whites for the first time. After three days of haggling at a luxury hotel here, Coach Factory Outlet opposition negotiators agreed to the new coalition and then elected as its president Sheikh Ahmad Coach Outlet Store Online Moaz al-Khatib, a former imam of the historic Umayyad mosque in Damascus and a respected national Coach Outlet Store figure within Syria. “Today in Doha is the first time the different factions of the Syrian Coach Factory Stores opposition are united in one body,” said Riyad Farid Hijab, a former Syrian prime minister and Coach Handbags Outlet the highest-level defector from the Damascus government. “So we ask the international Coach Factory Store community to recognize the Syrian opposition as the representative of the Coach Factory Online Syrians. The umbrella organization was designed to subsume the Syrian National Council, a Louis Vuitton Belt previous attempt at unification that has appeared increasingly marginalized as Syria Coach Factory Online has descended into civil war. That group’s authority was undercut when it failed to attract Coach Outlet sufficient support from key minorities, religious and tribal figures, businessmen, and, most Coach Factory Outlet important, rebel units conducting the fighting against President Bashar al-Assad’s forces. The Coach Outlet Store hope among Western countries is that the new coalition, called the National Coalition of Coach Factory Online Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces, can give local opposition councils the Coach Outlet Store Online legitimacy to bring fighters under their Coach Outlet Store Online en supposant que mal.

Posted by: Coach Factory Outlet at January 4, 2013 12:11 AM
Post a comment