February 15, 2005
Should Bush/Congress Harm Americans With Their Budget?
Quality of life and even life itself depends directly in America upon money. President Bush’s tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans are going to cost other Americans dearly in terms of quality of life and even life itself. Whenever an administration puts foreign affairs ahead of domestic priorities, it will increase tax payer dollar spending in foreign lands and decrease the services and benefits to the tax payers here at home. This is in fact an accurate depiction of the President’s 2006 Budget which again will set a new record deficit.
According to the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee hearing this morning, the President's budget seeks to cut Veteran's benefits in some ways to include a two year limit on eligibility for health care and reducing VA health workers by 3700 even as patient load is expected to increase. Long term care Veterans will be booted from the system by the President's Budget as the per diem funding to states is reduced at the same time most states are scrambling desperately to keep their budgets from sinking. Should the wealthy keep their tax cuts while Veteran's go without?
It is true that VA funding has been increasing about 9% per year over recent years and much improvement has taken place. But the VA itself indicates it has and still needs about 13% increases in order to meet our veteran's needs. It is just so inappropriate that the President should deny the VA what it needs after making such erroneous an decision to invade Iraq which has increased the demand for Veterans Administration services. The President's decision go to war electively while refusing to meet the VA's funding needs is the height of irresponsible government and leadership.
USA Today reports: "The Food and Drug Administration's proposed budget for next year includes cuts to nearly all its inspection programs, from checks on imported food to reviews of overseas plants that make prescription drugs bound for the USA." Should Americans suffer illness, disease, and injury due to this kind of lowering of priority for American tax payer safety and health?
At the same time the President is pushing for changing laws to reduce and even eliminate law suits against corporations who put profitability above safety for consumers, The Washington Post reports:
The number of elderly Americans treated in hospital emergency rooms for product-related injuries rose strongly from 1991 to 2002, according to a report issued Monday.The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission said emergency room admissions linked to consumer products for those 75 years and older rose 73 percent over the period, even though the population of that age group grew just 27 percent.
An Associated Press article states: "Five months after a presidential commission recommended spending billions more to protect the nation's oceans, the White House has proposed a budget that would reduce funding for fisheries and eliminate the Pacific Islands regional office in Hawaii." Americans are already being poisoned by pollutants building up in the fats of fish consumed by American tax payers. More authorities are warning pregnant women to avoid fish due to the growing health issues related to its consumption. And this budget cut will in effect, sweep the problem under the rug, rather than deal with it.
And while the President is sending 100's of billions of taxpayer dollars overseas, he has failed to provide accountability for those hard earned tax dollars. At least 9 billion, much of it American tax dollars, are unaccounted for in Iraq as reported just a few weeks ago. Yet, these stories of waste, fraud, and abuse of overseas spending continue to surface. The BBC reports: "Millions of dollars were wasted by the US-led Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) that ran Iraq after the fall of Baghdad, a former official has said."
Associated Press reports: "The Pentagon is investigating eight more Air Force contracts handled by Darleen Druyun, the former Air Force official who was convicted last year of giving The Boeing Co. special treatment on a tanker lease deal."
And the Washington Post reports: "A government contractor defrauded the Coalition Provisional Authority of tens of millions of dollars in Iraq reconstruction funds and the Bush administration has done little to try to recover the money, an attorney for two whistle-blowers told Democratic lawmakers Monday."
So to add insult to injury, in addition to cutting and removing services and benefits to tax payers and veterans here at home while deficit spending at record levels, this President is not even implementing the accountability and practices necessary to insure that tax payer dollars sent overseas are spent on their intended purposes.
Posted by David R. Remer at February 15, 2005 05:04 PMDavid,
Again as the Bush administration paints the men and women of the military as national heros, the military are going to find that this administration sees them just as they see the rest of us, as patsies.
Bush and his buddies are all about money, yours and mine. they want to squeeze every red cent out of all of us. I for one am less surprised every day.
Excellent article David.
This budget causes me to become more concerned and angry by the day. I want to stick around this country and figure out how to push all of the just agendas that the public can and will benefit from; but now, I am not so sure. What are we supposed to do while Bush squanders our money and we get nothing in return? I am ashamed to be an American right now under his leadership but I am proud to be an American; because I have the security to know that I can fight this garbage. Thanks David. Your articles help me learn every single day.
Yes, this spot is very necessary.
How about growing a large and larger grouping of concerned Americans (of all ages) with a general pledge: to sacrificing and to fighting to preserve the middle-class (non-govt.) productive jobs and living wage; clean food and water supplies; focus on alternative energy sources, etc. re environment; insisting on @80%
of corporations jobs on this soil or don’t sell here? Also, I see a need for taxing those who don’t buy American made products and/or taking away their Medicare[yes, seniors driving Lexuses can laugh at me when I inform them of need to buy American made or get no Medicare! am very serious. Tired of yuppies laughing at me as I inform of need to buy American made and what they just bought cost $1hr. to be made in China! [as they suffer no direct/immediate penalties for not doing so! same with all the expensive imported cars by all the yuppies and their offspring guppies who need to be mocked for selling out the country]; and must get all non-citizens off any use of govt. benefits usage(medical, schools, etc.[can’t do it folks as massive immigration is another part of the war on us—in many ways]; also sorry for some of you out there but have to reduce the fees and numbers of paper professionals (definitely lawyers use and costs) in the country and college programs re.
And, may have to go retro if we have to in order to cut down buying of imported goods! Might lead be good there.
Also, need to get all the U.S. Pension Funds to invest here in U.S. with the 80% American citizens
employed rule! (Don’t have to be union salaries, but need to be living wages.
_______________________________
Time to mock the intellectuals, and all the yuppies and their offspring guppies! All who wanted to live like princes and princesses off other people’s genuine hard work. This is not supposed to be a country of princes and princesses. That’s how things got so screwed up.
And, the moderate majority let things slide to the right & left idiots.
I’ve been telling them for quite a while now to wake up and act to turn their country around as American citizens…Or Bend Over and Kiss it Goodbye.
Posted by: Alex at February 16, 2005 12:23 AMI wouldn’t worry too much about the program cuts. Bush targeted programs that have a lot of Congressional support.
The only reason I can think of is, so that Bush can point at the battle over the paltry program cuts (compared to the $2 trillion tax cuts for the rich he wants extended - the middle-class tax cuts were extended last year - and the $4.5 trillion over two decades for privatizing Social Security) and say with his phony Texas-by-way-of-Connecticut-Harvard-and-Yale accent), “Lookee heah! Y’all know Awm tryin’ ta cut cawsts, but tha dang Congress won let me.”
It’s amazing what we take for granted in society these days.
Bush’s budget is crap, but they all are. The guys in Congress cannot hold back on their high-pork diets.
Time for term limits. Politics shouldn’t be a career. They should all be forced to go back to selling cars after a handful of years in office.
Posted by: mike at February 16, 2005 02:38 PM