Third Party & Independents: Archives

December 17, 2003

The battle in Miami

The violence at the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas conference in Miami, Florida was greater than at any globalization protest since the Battle in Seattle. However, the violence was restricted completely to one side. The appaling tactics of the police in beating and gassing of peaceful protestors caused sharp criticism even from conservative politicians in Florida. The FTAA organizers conceded that the demonstrators were peaceful and that there were indeed far fewer than they had expected. In light of this, what is the reason for the unprecedented brutality of the police? Is this the next step in the creation of a police state in the United States? Are any public demonstrations that are critical of the actions of the government going to met with such thuggish disregard for our Constitutional rights?

The Miami police had consulted the Seattle police extensively on how to prepare, in spite of the fact that an independent commission rebuked the Seattle police for their excessive violence and innumberable violations of the state constitution. Seattle has paid tens of millions of dollars to settle thousands of claims against the police as a result.

As has become common practice during globalization events and high profile political events, ordinances were rushed into place to restrict the right to assemble peacably. Police confiscated pamphlets and political literature (a violation of the First Amendment), protesters were assaulted with pepper spray and rubber bullets at close range, they were jailed and held until after the FTAA conference was over and no charges were ever filed. Reporters and photographers with valid press credentials were arrested and removed from the scene to prevent them from doing their job.

These actions fundamentally violate both the words and the intent of the Constitution of the United States of America. This is become not a land of freedom but a land of repression. A land where you are only allowed to speak your mind if you agree with those in power. I have been hearing a lot of people on the right who are thrilled with this turn of events, and I ask them: How happy will you be about the end of free speech and freedom of the press and freedom of association if liberals win the next election? How thrilled will you be that "those commies" who "don't deserve to have rights anyway" are suddenly controlling the power structure and can prevent you from having your say?

Posted by rev_matt_y at December 17, 2003 10:47 AM
Comments
Comment #4522

thanks for writing about this.

i find it amazing that the federal government had tacked on an 8.5 million dollar spending bill to the 87 billion for rebuilding iraq. that 8.5 million was used to buy the florida law enforcement new and updated equipment and nonlethal crowd control tools, such as the beanbag guns.

they geared up just in time, using taxpayer money to beat the living hell out of it’s own citizens…..

unbelievable.

personally, having been to protests, i hate the rabblerousers….a perfectly peaceful demonstration is a great way to get the message across if it is done LEGALLY.

however, some people just want to fight. and the miami police have begun using the term “anarchists” much like the federal government uses the term “terrorist”….by over generalizing and grouping people together, and making it an all or nothing issue. if you are standing next to someone who is an “anarchist” and is determined to cause trouble at a protest, then, as the miami police have stated, you are no better than the anarchists.

it is the herd mentality…beat them all down and they will keep their yaps shut.

i am not an anarchist, nor am i overly political…i’ve always thought of myself to be somewhat centrist….yet my country actually scares me sometimes.

because what happens when the day comes that what i value or believe in becomes unpopular?

the fact that people are out there who claim that to speak out against the goverment or President Bush is an act of Treason…….treason…scary that this is becoming popular thought.

Posted by: rob at December 17, 2003 10:03 PM
Comment #4530

I am amazed this has not received more media coverage. Total security = total police state. Sounds a bit like our foreign policy, come to think of it, just swap police with U.S. military.

Posted by: David R. Remer at December 18, 2003 10:25 PM