October 21, 2003
Post 9/11: How America Went from a Republic to a Fascist State
Every time I have suggested that America has become fascist, I get looks of ridicule from the Right and a few nods from the Left, but no one wants to admit that Bush’s “trifecta” has issued in fascism. By using Dr. Lawrence Britt’s The 14 Defining Characteristics of Fascism, I will show how in post 9/11 America, we are indeed living in a fascist state.
1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism
Dr. Britt describes this as “Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.”
In the days after 9/11, sales of the American Flag and other patriotic icons skyrocketed to the point that stores could not keep them on the shelves. Row after row of houses on any given street in any given town in America were decorated with waving flags, flag magnets decorated cars and trucks, and people wore flag covered clothing to show their pro-America support. The Twin Towers became symbols of the American capitalistic might, new songs were written to express patriotic views and the disdain of terrorism, and the Bush Administration has continued, even two years later, to use the events of September 11th to rouse up patriotism for any foreign policy it wishes to emphasize.
2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights
Dr. Britt’s description for this point is “Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.”
This point is so blatantly obvious, and perhaps the scariest of all. One only has to remember how quickly Congress passed the U.S. PATRIOT Act, so named as to prevent any member of Congress from not signing it or be declared unpatriotic, which has the potential to strip away even our basic Constitutional rights and gives unprecedented powers to the FBI and other policing forces. Rep. Ron Paul has even admitted in numerous interviews that they signed that bill into law without having read the final draft. Any Americans who cautioned that we were giving up our Constitutional rights for a little security were scoffed at and called unpatriotic. And look how long we Americans have tolerated the incarceration of political prisoners without formal charges and proper legal advice.
3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
Dr. Britt describes this point as “The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial, ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.”
In this case, Muslims have been targeted for both their religious ideals and for being “terrorists” and some Americans have rallied behind the President as he continually called these people “evildoers” over and over again in speech after speech. Although Bush commented that Islam was not a target, he has done nothing to silence the preachers from bellowing from their pulpits of the “evils of Islam” nor has he reprimanded the General who recently compared Islam to Satan while defiling the military code of ethics. Shortly after 9/11, Muslim-Americans in this country were rounded up and imprisoned without representation of legal council.
4. Supremacy of the Military
Dr. Britt describes this point as “Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.”
Unemployment in post-911 is at an all-time high. Health care, the environment, social security, and education have all fallen to the wayside. The Federal deficit is now at $374.2 Billion because of the Afghan and Iraq wars. Military spending is out of control. And big corporations with ties to the Bush Administration have been given sole military contracts to “rebuild” Iraq. However, the final blow came when Bush reinstated the nuclear program to build precision nuclear “mini” bombs.
5. Rampant Sexism
Many will say that this point doesn’t make much sense in today’s culture; however, Dr. Britt describes it as “The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Divorce, abortion and homo-sexuality are suppressed and the state is represented as the ultimate guardian of the family institution.”
If you think this point has not reared its ugly head, then you are sadly mistaken. Abortion issues have been on the table, as well as a backlash against homosexuality. Marriage contracts involving money, with the goal to keep marriages from ending in divorce, have been discussed, as well as a proposed amendment to the Constitution to declare marriages as being solely between a male and female. Traditional family values and roles have been proclaimed. And if you look at the majority of decision-makers in the Bush Administration, they are mostly male-dominated.
6. Controlled Mass Media
Oh yes, this point has definitely come into play. Dr. Britt describes this point as “Sometimes the media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.”
In this case, the media was cautioned to “watch what they say,” journalists found themselves involved in self-censorship, and were embedded with the military during the Iraq war where all reports had to go through the military censorship before being allowed to go to print. And one final observation that I personally made during the build-up to war with Iraq, any time there was a special event planned on television for opposition to this war, the President or one of his advisors suddenly had a special news conference to discuss their own agendas, which of course, all news stations carried, thus eliminating the special event that was to take place. Furthermore, pro-Bush events are widely televised, whereas protests are rarely shown on television or in the print media.
7. Obsession with National Security
Dr. Britt describes this point as “Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.”
This point is undeniable: the creation of a new Homeland Defense department, constant terrorist alerts, new airport screening provisions, and the bombardment of messages from Bin Laden or Saddam Hussein any time it appears that the people are forgetting that Bush is fighting a war on terrorism. In the past two years, the anxiety levels of American citizens have been kept at a high level, lest we forget the events of 9/11.
8. Religion and Government are Intertwined
Dr. Britt describes this point as “Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.”
When the American President says that God told him to attack Iraq, this point has been made. Furthermore, there is a rising belief in this country among fanatical Christians that Bush was appointed President by the Christian God and that it is his role to stamp-out the “evil Satanic” Islamic religion. We also see the constant religious rhetoric in Bush’s speeches.
9. Corporate Power is Protected
Dr. Britt describes this point as “The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.”
There is little room for doubt that big corporations heavily supported and still support the Bush Administration and have called-in their favors for helping get him elected. Even during the façade of the corporate scandals that rocked the early part of Bush’s presidency, we witnessed favoritism over certain corporate CEOs like Enron’s Ken Lay. Furthermore, when military contracts were being handed out, corporations with close ties to many Bush officials were given sole rights. Even the tax cuts that Bush has handed out have benefited these wealthy CEOs more than the average American citizen.
10. Labor Power is Suppressed
Dr. Britt describes this point as “Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed.”
One of the key strategies of the Bush Administration has been to bust unions. Labor laws have also been tackled by this Administration and worker rights have been attacked. Bush even blatantly tried to end the Over-time pay laws for the working class.
11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts
Dr. Britt describes this point as “Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts and letters is openly attacked.”
Although this point appears to be the least acted upon in the Bush Administration, there has been evidence that some professors and academics have been censored and some “liberal-minded” intellectuals highly criticized by this Administration. Some artistic expressions, like artwork showing Bush in an unfavorable light on t-shirts and signs, have been highly censored or criticized.
12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment
Dr. Britt describes this point as “Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.”
The new laws under the U.S. PATRIOT Act gave law enforcement officials new limitless powers in searches and wire-tapping. Furthermore, efforts have been made to combine the CIA and the FBI together, as well as combine local and state police forces with military forces.
13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
Dr. Britt describes this point as “Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders.”
The entire Bush Administration consists of personnel who were appointed to their positions because of friendships and/or business ties to the Bush Family. Ken Lay, as well as other CEOs, has escaped persecution because of his close friendship and business dealings with members of the Bush Administration. Our national resources, such as forests and wildlife refuges, have been attacked because of business ties with the Bush Administration. If you take a look at the policies behind the Bush Administration, these policies have almost been followed word for word from reports created by a group called PNAC (Project for a New American Century). Those on the board of this group are all working members in the Bush Administration, plus one of his own brothers, Jeb Bush.
14. Fraudulent Elections
Dr. Britt describes this point as “Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections.”
Some still feel that the debauchery of the 2000 election has not been fully investigated in this country and has been generally overlooked by the majority of the populace due to media cover-up. Greg Palast, an American investigative journalist who writes for a British syndication, shortly after the 2000 election, uncovered numerous voting scams committed in Florida, including a list of voter suppressions due to criminal records that denied thousands of mainly black (and heavily democratic) voters from being allowed to vote. This list contained names that were similar or had the same birthdates as known felons. Some of the people on the list were denied the right to vote even though they had been given their rights back from a different state than Florida, which does not reinstate voting rights to felons.
Furthermore, states which are using the new electronic voting devises have reported discrepancies in elections even during the 2000 election and since. Many of these voting devises were manufactured from companies affiliated with the Republic Party and one is even owned by a Republican Representative in Congress. The Bush Administration has even encouraged all states to install these new voting devises and has set time limits and given funds to states to have these devises in working order before the 2004 election. Bev Harris has written a book about black box voting and the potential harm that can come to our elections due to the inadequacy of these voting devises. She has proven that they are not tamper-proof and are open to attacks from hackers. She has stated that they can also be tampered with to sway a vote in favor of one candidate or another.
In conclusion, every point that Dr. Britt has made for Fascism can be seen in the current Bush Administration’s policies. It is difficult to live in this country and see our great Republic being destroyed by the rampant disregard for our Constitution and rights by Bush and his regime. Some may think that what has been done cannot be undone and that we should just accept the current road our country has taken. Others are holding on to the belief that our government will not fail us and will remain true to the Constitution, and that these changes are only temporary and all of our rights will be returned to us once the “war on terrorism” is over. However, what they do not realize is that our forefathers cautioned us that once our rights have been stripped away, they may never be returned. They further warned that it is our duty, when we see that our government is not representing the people, to remove those in power and replace them with those who will represent the people, by using our vote, or by revolution if necessary.
Justin,
As you can see from the double post, I was having some issues earlier. I would spend a good chunk of time typing up a response to something only to have it timeout when I went to post…so, I tried the short and sweet method, and it worked.
Now, I could have pointed out that it is obvious that the author of this piece has not read the Patriot Act, but instead bases their opinion on all the hype that has surrounded it as the sister text of the Necronomicon.
Or, I could have also mentioned that (at 11), the author seems to think that criticism is the hallmark of the fascist and realized that any response I posted would have resulted in my being labeled as such.
Or, I could have pointed out that whether we vote via manual punch cards or electronic machines, the left always finds a way to label any victory for the Republicans a ‘conspiracy’.
Or, I could have mentioned that the author’s worldview is so jaded as to blame the entire national deficit on the War on Terror (at 4) without a word toward the massive bureaucracy of social programs that continue to consume the majority of federal funds.
Finally, I could have questioned the legitimacy of the author’s source, seeing as the only mention of Dr. Lawrence Britt on the WWW is in relation to this article. It makes me think that either he is very sparsely published or that there is something more amiss.
In the end, I chose the much simpler quote you see above…and, I think it sums it up well.
-kd
Posted by: Karl at October 21, 2003 08:28 PMThis is a classic post. I am hoping, but not too confident, that this is an example of the media staking out an extreme position to encourage feedback. Similar to a shock jock on the airwaves. Otherwise, with such a jaded world view, it is surprising that the author gets out of bed each morning. The post hits on some of my favorite topics, and I look forward to a more articulate defense of these topics in the posts to come.
The “Powerful and Continuing Nationalism.” The immediate aftermath of 9-11 was uncertainty and fear. Seeing flags and the patriotism gave people strength. Keep in mind, no one wanted to fly on planes, no one wanted to go on the Metro, people avoided large crowds, etc. Patriotism was very helpful in getting through those days. I can not speak to what was going on in other parts of the country, but Boston ahd DC needed that strength. Besides, what is wrong with loving your country? America does stand for a lot of good, regardless of how much you like or dislike our current foreign policy.
The Patriot Act is another prime topic. Can anyone here name a single person who has been detained by the Gov’t that was not somehow involved in the planning or actual attack against America? This is classic liberal theory that is never applied in the real world.
Trying to link pro-life with being sexist? That is a tremendous stretch, nice work. People are free to have views on abortion. Just because the Administration is not pro-choice, does not make them sexist. Fradulent elections…bone up on the Electoral System.
If you want to take a look at a constitutional abuse, check out the Judicial Nominations going on in the Senate. That is an abuse.
If Bush starts looking to repeal term limits and place the country under martial law, I will agree. But just because you are anti-Bush, anti-business, pro-choice, pro-union, and against our current foreign policy, that does not make an administration fascist. Thought provoking article, but interesting application of the facts.
Posted by: Rob at October 21, 2003 09:10 PMKarl,
Have YOU read the Patriot Act, or are you simply basing your response on the typical conservative response to the typical liberal reaction?
Additionally, check out http://w3.access.gpo.gov/usbudget/fy2003/hist.html
The “massive” social programs you refer to (namely Medicare, Food and Housing Assistance, and Soc. Sec.) take up just less than half of the Federal Budget. The other big ticket items are Defense spending, Education, Transportation, Vetrans Affairs, Justice, and paying for the interest on all of the debt that have run up in the past on defecits like those we have in the present.
And please don’t argue that programs like the former are not necessary, since the American society I know is one where we help each other up the ladder by providing a safety net for those that fall off; not one where we trample over each other to get to the top, and let those who slip rest where they fall.
As for the Good Dr’s credentials, they don’t matter if the analysis of fascism is correct according to the generally held definitions of fascism.
fas·cism ( P ) Pronunciation Key (fshzm)
n.
often Fascism
A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
Oppressive, dictatorial control.
It is clear that the Dr. is stretching, given that the traditional definition paints a much more severe picture.
I personally don’t believe that the US is becoming a fascist state, but you can see that a reasonable argument could be made that some of the characteristics of a fascist state are present in our society, on a smaller basis.
Posted by: Ber-tube-zzi at October 22, 2003 11:38 AMHere is the link to the Patiot Act, if anyone is interested.
http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/hr3162.pdf
It is 342 pages of US Code amending, that is nearly impossible to read. This is why we depend on our representatives to interpret the language of laws for us, and when some of those representatives admit that THEY haven’t even read the law, we have reason to be concerned.
Not to mention that the weight of opinions of the people that HAVE read the law seem to side with the interpreation that the Act is a bit far-reaching, and challenging to commonly held Constiutional rights.
I am honest when I say that I would like to see a rebuttal of these claims, from a non-partisan source.
Posted by: Ber-tube-zzi at October 22, 2003 11:59 AMAnd, a reasonable arguement could be made comparing the characteristics of Disney Land with our society…that doesn’t make it intellectually significant.
The author of this post suggests revolution as a legitimate option at this point. I don’t think they are talking about ‘a smaller basis’.
-kd
Posted by: Karl at October 22, 2003 12:04 PMYou step too far in saying that because we could also make comparisons to Disney Land, discussion of similarities with Fascism is not intellectually worthwhile.
While the former conversation would be purely fantastical, owing the the nature of a “Disneyland” society, the latter conversation is based on a very real proposition (fascist societies have existed and continue to exist).
The logical fallacy renders such an obeservation impotent.
Posted by: Ber-tube-zzi at October 22, 2003 12:40 PM#6, Controleed mass media. Of the top 10 books on the NY Times bestseller list for non-fiction:
# 1 Michael Moore, Dude Where’s My Country
# 3 Al Franken, Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell THem
# 6 Molly Ivins and Lou Dubose, Bushwacked
# 8 Paul Krugman, The Great Unravelling
Looks like we have a bit of work to do before dissent is stifled
Andymac
Posted by: Andymac at October 24, 2003 02:20 PM“Can anyone here name a single person who has been detained by the Gov’t that was not somehow involved in the planning or actual attack against America?”
First, give them time. Once the Bush admin has milked the foreign terrorist issue dry, then they’ll start inside our borders. Ashcroft already tried to prosecute an accused terrorist’s lawyer for “aiding terrorism.” If he’ll go that far this soon, there’s no limit to how far he’ll go. (Given that U.S. law is largely directed by precedents, this is a SERIOUS concern.) But the bigger issue here is that the law—as written—give more power to Ashcroft than the Bill of Rights allows.
Second: Guantanamo Bay…? Or are you simply assuming their guilt? They’ve not been tried yet. And as we see in our own military, not everyone who joins up is a zealot. We don’t know much at all about these folks, thanks to their being indefinitely detained without counsel.
Posted by: dan at October 30, 2003 10:05 AM“#6, Controleed mass media. Of the top 10 books on the NY Times bestseller list for non-fiction:
# 1 Michael Moore, Dude Where’s My Country
# 3 Al Franken, Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell THem
# 6 Molly Ivins and Lou Dubose, Bushwacked
# 8 Paul Krugman, The Great Unravelling
Looks like we have a bit of work to do before dissent is stifled”
Boy, that’s a big victory for liberals. That really has the same weight as owning and controlling what’s on television and radio. Especially since Americans devote all their time to reading.
Note: Conservatives don’t need to worry about what’s published. That stuff’s pretty much pre-sold to converts (preaching to the choir). It’s what’s on the TV that has the major influence.
Posted by: dan at October 30, 2003 10:10 AMAs for the 14 points in the original post, these ALL apply to what’s going on in the U.S.
America is definitely POINTED towards Fascism. But we’re a very long way from 1930s Germany.
And what keeps us from the edge is the constant vigilance of liberals.
Posted by: dan at October 30, 2003 10:12 AMBy these definitions it seems that the USA has been a fascist state from its inception.
Posted by: Chris at October 30, 2003 11:39 AMDan,
You say, “That really has the same weight as owning and controlling what’s on television and radio.” Like what? NPR? Eminem? Wu Tang Clan? Nelly? ABC? NBC? CBS? CNN? Will and Grace? Queer Eye for the Straight Guy? Who’s in charge of controlling what’s on television and radio?
Don’t get me wrong. I like all of those things. I watch/listen to them all and enjoy them (except the local network news, which I can’t stand). It is hardly evidence of a media controlled by the White House, however.
Posted by: Jason Erickson at October 31, 2003 02:18 AMI am also concerned about the state of the Union. I recieved information at a young age, from history teachers, that this might happen that the union could disolve again. That an internal power might take control. I am a student of history, and believe the constitution of The United States of America to be an inspired document defiled. I feel compelled to express my defiance continuously, and without an adequate outlet I fret internally and must purge with physical exorcise. I long for an intelectual outlet and am enlightened by your observation. Thank you.
Posted by: Kerry Burns at November 4, 2003 05:58 PMMussolini, the inventor of fascism, stated that, “The first stage of fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and Corporate power.” Mussolini would have approved of handing out no bid contracts to corporations which have long and deep connections with members of the current administration.
The fact that the Patriot Act allows for the pulling of library records is so Orwellian it is comical.
The withdrawal of the “Reagans” a docu-drama because it provides an unbalanced view is, however, not funny, as this is a curb on a constitutional right. The notion that there is a requirement for dramatic productions to be “balanaced” is absurd, and highlights the the unhealthy influence certain groups have over the media.
And they may not be American, but a number of the people held for up to 18 months, in the legal limbo that is Guantanamo, have had to be released because there was no evidence to support their incarceration, some have returned home to find their businesses and livelihoods ruined. There are bound to be more who are being unjustly held at the moment. This is a disgrace.
Posted by: Bob Hope at November 5, 2003 11:41 AM
Sadly and tragically, you are absolutely right. What first brought the whole notion home to me was when the establishment of the new “Department of Homeland Security” was first mooted. The name immediately triggered red flags in my head, for it is an exact translation of “Heimatschutz,” one of the buzzwords used by the Nazis when referring to the yeoman services provided by the Gestapo for the Third Reich.
Posted by: V. Vincent Williams at November 5, 2003 04:02 PM