Third Party & Independents: Archives

August 26, 2003

GOP Raising Funds via Offshore Workers

The theory of trickle down economics and tax cuts for the affluent was that American business would grow, and new American jobs would be created. The GOP has, in a sly manuever to elicit fun-raising services from a telemarketing firm in India, shown that such theories and philosophies are merely the gaseous stench of corruption. The stench of course is not limited to Republicans, Clinton himself was party to this type of economic bait-and-switch, endowing China with most preferred nation status, removing trade restrictions (via GATT and NAFTA), and a marked increase in H1-B visas. Albeit without the obvious pandering to business in the form of tax breaks. Is trickle down economics a misnomer? Shall we call it what it really is: table scraps economics?

Posted by Stephen VanDyke at August 26, 2003 02:56 PM
Comments
Comment #2110

Offshore souricing is disgusting to begin with, but this takes the cake! The Party of Bush directly sending American jobs off-shore.

Bastards! Another bit of insight into the slime these wealthy, white, Protestant conservatives are!

Robbie

Posted by: Robbie D at August 26, 2003 04:22 PM
Comment #2111

By the way, I am a poor, white, Protestant liberal. ;-)

Posted by: Robbie D at August 26, 2003 05:05 PM
Comment #2118

What does being Protestant have to do with this discussion? Or being white for that matter?

Posted by: CJ at August 26, 2003 10:58 PM
Comment #2124

CJ,

Because wealthy, white, Protestant, male conservatives are running the country. If it is good for them, it is what gets done.

Offshore sourcing is good for this ruling-class.

Rob

PS: To be in the ruling class, you must have all of those attributes.

Posted by: Robbie D at August 27, 2003 10:22 AM
Comment #2132

Robbie,
It is ironic that someone can be racist against himself.
“bastards”? Nice, your lowering this discussion into something that is very “Base” and ugly.

You could be a member of the “ruling class” (bourgeoise) if you had not made some bad decisions in your life that caused you to be “poor”. Just think Robbie, you don’t have to represent the proletariat your whole life! You can make your own money, start a business, climb the corporate ladder etc…whatever you do will be your own responsibility though.

Posted by: Pete at August 27, 2003 01:33 PM
Comment #2136

Pete,

Before you insult me, you should read what I wrote. In my theory, you must be many things to be in the current ruling class, including “Conservative” which, you might agree, I am not.

:-)

Robbie D.

Posted by: Robbie D at August 27, 2003 03:30 PM
Comment #2138

On second thought. I am gone. I left once, came back. I am not here to be belittled.

Good Bye.

Posted by: Robbie D at August 27, 2003 03:42 PM
Comment #2140

Mee too! I just can’t take the pressure anymore. Good bye cruel world….**sob**
J/K.

Posted by: Pete at August 27, 2003 03:57 PM
Comment #2154

Dean spoke out against off-shoring when he was in Seattle. The crowd ate it up.

Posted by: Jake of 8bitjoystick.com at August 27, 2003 06:27 PM
Comment #2159

I have no idea what the heck just went on in this conversation.

Just needed to clear that up. :)

Posted by: Jason Lauborough at August 27, 2003 08:32 PM
Comment #2172

While I don’t have anything but anecdotal evidence to support this statement, I predict offshore outsourcing will become one of the major hot button topics of Campaign 2004. I know - no real stretch there. But the anger that I pick up in conversations, reading message boards or news stories in general shows that there’s no middle ground on this one.

The question remains as to who will take the brunt of the anger as the public looks for someone to blame. In the interest of full discosure, I’m someone who’s been looking for a full time job for more than a year (I’m freelancing in the meantime). I’m one of the uncounted thousands who have given up - the jobs that used to be there don’t exist anymore. The outrage has to go somewhere.

Posted by: 9thwave at August 28, 2003 12:08 PM
Comment #2174

9th, I agree with you, this is an issue that will only become more contentious as the election draws nearer. I too have first hand knowledge of how this is effecting Americans; I and my team was laid off and replaced by H1-B Visa holders, and our jobs eventually went overseas. I was out of work for almost a year and in the end I went from making a high five-figure salary to stacking boxes part-time at a national computer resellers local warehouse for $10.00 an hour and no benefits.

I eventually found a job with far less responsibility and at a much lower salary then the one I had before I was laid off. We still have our house, but only because my disabled wife receives SSN benefits. As it is, we went into considerable debt just living day-to-day, a situation we are still climbing out of. Our savings are gone, so too our 401K, and we are living on the edge. Not a good feeling. Some of the members of my team are still looking for jobs!

So (Pete), I see this as much more then companies moving with market forces and chasing profit wherever it may lie. As the high tech jobs that fueled the middle class after manufacturing all but disappeared in the late seventies, continue to disappear overseas, what will replace them. Service sector jobs do not now, nor will they ever, pay what white-collar jobs pay. How much longer will it be before this trend has an irreversible effect on an economy, which is fueled mostly (2/3) by consumer spending, continue to grow. As the middle class dwindles will the upper class be able to sustain the U.S. economy on its own? Lower class citizens cannot afford big-ticket items, and Walmart cannot carry the entire U.S. economy on its back.

We have to realize that the future of our nation as one of the first world is at stake, as well as our current standard of living. This practice is wrong, wrong, wrong, and no amount of rationalization can make it right! We are a nation of people, a society, not a corporation. Excessive greed has a cost!

Posted by: V. Edward Martin at August 28, 2003 01:17 PM
Comment #2175

Of course you are right on many points Mr. Martin.
Who will be there to buy those big ticket items when noone is making a good living? Right now I do not believe that corporations have any loyalty to the nation. Many have become Internationalized companies rather than American. What is the solution to this problem? If we pass legislation to combat it wont corporations just re-locate in other countries entirely?

Posted by: Pete at August 28, 2003 02:41 PM
Comment #2179

Pete—

I think we should look to the United Nations, World Trade Organization and or the World Bank. With the help of these organizations countries that hold their workers out as little more then chattel, to be ill used by International Corporations (American and otherwise), can be pressured to raise the standard of living of their societies. What we need of course is a United Nations sponsored Declaration of Rights for the Worker, which international bodies like the World Trade Organization and the World Bank sigh on to and agree to adhere to.

Pressuring countries one at a time to enact legislation to raise wages and mandate benefits will not work, because as Mexico is finding out, companies will go elsewhere (Asia) is an effort to find cheaper, and cheaper labor. Also, the United States government must, I said must, come to a realization the current exodus of White collar workers to Asia will eventually take it toll on the U.S. economy and our way of life. That requires leadership and vision, both of which are in very short supply in Washington these days.

Lastly, the world’s nations have to stop trying to enrich themselves by picking the bone of other nations. International Corporations are doing what they are doing because the world’s governments are allowing them to do it. If the standard of living of ALL the words nations were raised in a united effort, International Corporations would find little incentive to relocate overseas. Why for instance does India allow Microsoft to pay an Indian software engineer a mere $10,000 a year (no benefits) while that same person would make would make $70,000 – $100,000 in the U.S.? India gets the jobs, yes, but does the standard of living for the country as a whole rise?

Posted by: V. Edward Martin at August 28, 2003 03:47 PM
Comment #2185

“If the standard of living of ALL the words nations were raised in a united effort, International Corporations would find little incentive to relocate overseas.”

How would you go about doing that? Raising the standard of living in other countries is a pretty big job.

“India gets the jobs, yes, but does the standard of living for the country as a whole rise?”

Yes it does. Look at the standard of living in Asia since thier American driven Industrial revolution. That is part of the problem. I don’t giva a damn about another countries standard of living, I care about my countries standard of living.

Posted by: Pete at August 28, 2003 06:21 PM
Comment #2186

Pete, you’re on your way to becoming a champion for the cause, only you messed up:

I don’t giva [sic] a damn about another countries [sic] standard of living, I care about my countries [sic] standard of living.
should be:
I don’t give a damn about my country’s standard of living, I care about my standard of living.

Now go out and slap down some socialists for me :)

Posted by: Stephen VanDyke at August 28, 2003 06:28 PM
Comment #2188

Steve, you are putting words into my mouth and that is wrong. I never said that. I DO care about my country. I would love to smack down some socialists though. They are fundamentally un-American and do not believe in the free market system that drives this greatest of nations. **chuckle**

Posted by: Pete at August 28, 2003 06:36 PM
Comment #2190

Pete, I wasn’t putting words in your mouth, I was calling you a liberal :)

Posted by: Stephen VanDyke at August 28, 2003 06:46 PM
Comment #2193

Why?

Posted by: pete at August 28, 2003 08:40 PM
Comment #2201

Pete—

Your attitude is one of the reasons Americans and America, where our values are increasingly being defined by Gucci, Reebok, Nike, and Tommy Hilfiger, and well to do teenage white girls are selling themselves for same, are so despised around the world. We do not live upon this earth alone, and unless the start giving a damn about other countries standards of living, we might find ourselves among the ranks of those we now wash our hands of, and have to go crawling to them for jobs.

By raising the standard of living of other nations we protect American jobs, and our own standard of living, by creating a disincentive for American corporations to go overseas with their high paying jobs. Get it? Please pay attention; I thought I explained this in glowing detail in my last comment.

And let me get this straight: you believe that not believing in this capitalist system and all of its shortcomings is “fundamentally un-American”? Please explain that most ignorant statement.

Posted by: V. Edward Martin at August 29, 2003 08:52 AM
Comment #2218

Pete,
“I don’t giva a damn about another countries standard of living, I care about my countries standard of living.”

It’s that sort of attitude that is leading to the loss of jobs in our nation to companies in India. Because when you don’t care that people in India are happy to have a salary of less than half what an American makes for the same work, then you don’t care about Americans. So, by accepting the indignations that these multi-nationals force on other peoples, in other cultures we not only drive jobs away from Americans, but we also breed the type of anger that we should be trying to avoid.

Attitudes like your’s expressed above are elitist and you have no right to be. We have a great number of freedoms in this country, but I find the freedom to think that others should have to suffer for your own personal pleasure is about as anti-American as I can imagine. Attitudes like yours lead to Wal-Mart being a significant trading partner with China, and funding the Chinese prison system through prison labor shops making tshirts for Wal-Mart. The prisoners don’t even get paid. You know, you treat people like that and it breeds anger.

Who next will you not care about? Will it be African-American children? Statistics show that one third of African-American males will end up in prison before they are 27. For Hispanics, the figure is one in six.

Will you not care about your neighbors? Two weeks ago close to 20% of Americans were effected by a black out. That’s nearly one in five. Will you not care about thier standard of living? Where is your outrage at the government for letting these utilities deregulate, and then not demanding that there be higher standards?

You probably don’t feel that outrage because you are too busy thinking that you’ve got it made compared to some poor guy in India. Right now you do, but that guy in India is pretty smart. That guy in China is pretty pissed. The kids in jail in the US are pretty pissed too. They’re pissed that you had an opportunity that they were never offered. And you are looking smug about it.

Posted by: Hank at August 30, 2003 04:48 PM