Sorry, Did Romney's Video Offend You?
There’s a common cliché, “The truth hurts.” Liberals have made it quite clear they are utterly offended by the remarks Mitt Romney made in the recent leaked video at a fundraiser in May. He touched on multiple sensitive subjects, but in every message there was a truth. Yes, perspective can change truths, but that’s politics. Nothing Romney said should be deemed offensive because “the truth hurts sometimes.”
Posted by bigtex at September 20, 2012 4:13 PM
We do have a broken syllogism, however.
While it is true that virtually all the deadbeats will vote for Obama (if they vote at all), not all Obama voters are deadbeats.
Romney also included too many people. Not all those who don’t pay taxes are deadbeats or Democrats
According to Gallup, “Thirty-six percent of voters say Romney’s comments make them less likely to vote for him, while 20% say the remarks make them more likely to vote for him, and 43% say the comments won’t make a difference.”
However, on the latest daily poll, Romney and Obama are tied at 47%. Obama’s approval is also down to 46% and his disapproval is 48%.
It doesn’t appear that Romney’s comments are hurting him despite the mainstream media and Democrats going absolutely bonkers over it.
It looks like this race is going to tied until the end.
It’s unfortunate that you have to choose your ideology before you choose your TV channel. The MSM is an extension of the campaigns.
“The MSM is an extension of the campaigns.”
Wow, Comedy Central is now a part of the MSM. You gotta really be digging deep for that one.
How about the truth is the truth no matter where it comes from.
Of course Comedy Central is mainstream. Who doesn’t at least know about the Daily Show? Doesn’t that fit the definition of “mainstream”?
Cherry picking your facts to paint a picture does not impress me.
That’s what the MSM has down to a science. They don’t necessarily lie, they just cherry pick facts, take things out of context, and repeat the same talking points over and over again.
You can post videos or articles from one bias source and Republicans can post videos or article from another bias source.
What’s the point? Does it change anyone’s mind?
Like I said, you have to choose your ideology before you choose your TV channel.
Most Americans agree that the MSM is unreliable. This election is up for grabs regardless of what the media has to say.
The majority of Americans still do not have confidence in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately, and fairly. The 44% of Americans who have a great deal or fair amount of trust and the 55% who have little or no trust remain among the most negative views Gallup has measured.
The majority of Americans (60%) also continue to perceive bias, with 47% saying the media are too liberal and 13% saying they are too conservative, on par with what Gallup found last year. The percentage of Americans who say the media are “just about right” edged up to 36% this year but remains in the range Gallup has found historically.
The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press has been tracking views of press performance since 1985, and the overall ratings remain quite negative. Fully 66% say news stories often are inaccurate, 77% think that news organizations tend to favor one side, and 80% say news organizations are often influenced by powerful people and organizations.
Nothing Romney said should be deemed offensive because “the truth hurts sometimes.”
So, Republicans think it is perfectly acceptable for a president to write off half the country as worthless moochers?
I think it’s complete horsesh*t and highly offensive.
Romney at that 50,000 dollar a plate fundraiser:
“If blacks and latinos show up at the polls, the country is in serious trouble”
This is something Republicans think is also the truth and not at all offensive?
I not only think that is complete horsesh*t, but it is without a doubt the most offensive and racist comment I have ever heard any candidate for president say in my lifetime.
Sorry, Did Romney’s Video Offend You?
Today’s Republican Party is never sorry about any of the freakishly vicious and nasty, heartless and mannerless things that you say.
Decent people are repelled by the increasing offensiveness, cluelessness, and insanity you display.
Bigtext: “Nothing Romney said should be deemed offensive because ‘the truth hurts sometimes.’”
This seems to be one popular conservative response to the video but it’s just not true. It’s not offensive because it’s true, it’s offensive because it’s not true.
Plus the 47% quote is only one of the offensive things. He also said it would be easier to win if he were Latino, that they’re using Ann Sparingly so she doesn’t get old or attacked (I wonder why the right expects first ladies to get attacked since they’ve treated Michelle so fairly), that a two-state solution is useless (already flip-flopped on that one), and he set up his current reasoning for being so vague on policy: He thinks the American public is too stupid to understand specifics so he’d rather lie and say things like “you built that” and “I’ll keep God in my platform!”
Real Clear Politics currently lists 8 tossup states right now worth 100 electoral votes. Obama leads in all but North Carolina. The internal polling of the Romney campaign must be freaking out. Their only hope is to try and make Obama look like a fool in the debates but the trouble with debates is both sides say they won and they spin it every which way until the truth doesn’t matter. Maybe the “MSM” will ask Obama what he reads and he won’t have a good answer…
“Cherry picking your facts to paint a picture does not impress me.”
And of course it’s not cherry picking the facts to say that 153 million people are dependent on the government and don’t pay taxes, and then blame it all on the current administration.
You pick your cherries, I’ll pick mine.
Oh, and BTW, my cherries are funnier than yours are.
“Romney at that 50,000 dollar a plate fundraiser:
“If blacks and latinos show up at the polls, the country is in serious trouble”.
Said by Adrienne.
Adrienne, do you have a link to Romney saying this at a fundraiser? I Googled it and could not find the comment.
SO Joseph why is it the leader in misinformation Faux News channel is not part of the MSM? They have the most viewers of any of the cable news channels.
From your link to Pew-
“Despite their negative views about the press and the accuracy and fairness of its reports, most people say they are able to find news that is accurate. About six-in-ten (62%) say the news sources they use most generally get the facts straight; by comparison, just 25% say that news organizations generally get the facts straight.”
Seems to me this says it all. Your source of info is biased not mine we all seem to say. Stewart has showed us the hypocrisy that is Faux news, the worst offender by far in the biased reporting propaganda game that corporate media has become. Yet many stand by it as being a reliable source of “news”. The problem is as much the people as it is the media, IMHO.
j2, Fox isn’t no different than the other MSM sources for joke piucs. But it is kind of funny that Obama is AWOL from his brifeings and now says that the attacks on our Embassies was a terror attack after a week of claiming otherwise. He’s really up on his foreign affairs isn’t he. Vegas trip was more important to him.
KAP Faux is different though. It is the problem. The hypocrisy of Faux is greater than all other cable news outlets combined. The bias of Faux is almost greater than all other cable news outlets combined.
Why is that so funny KAP? Are you saying that Obama cannot change as more facts come in to play? That he must double down on being mistaken or wrong as Romney does?
BULLSHIT j2, the other MSM sources get a pass because people like you enjoy when the other guy gets the bashing.
It’s funny because the Libyian President got it right a week before and Obama didn’t. That’s what he gets for not being at his briefings and doing what he does best being Campaigner in Chief.
Adrienne, do you have a link to Romney saying this at a fundraiser? I Googled it and could not find the comment.
I should not have put what I wrote in quotes, although that was the gist of Romney’s remarks about Latinos.
Here is what he said:
The other is just about my heritage—my dad, you probably know, was the governor of Michigan and was the head of a car company, but he was born in Mexico. And had he been born of Mexican parents I’d have a better shot at winning this, but he was [audience laughs] unfortunately born of Americans living in Mexico. They’d lived there for a number of years, and, uh, I mean I say that jokingly, but it’d be helpful if they’d been Latino…
…we’re having a much harder time with Hispanic voters. And if the Hispanic voting bloc becomes as committed to the Democrats as the African American voting bloc has in the past, why we’re in trouble as a party and, I think, as a nation.
These are racist, blatantly divisive remarks being comfortably said in what was undoubtedly a room full of extremely wealthy, privileged white people just like Mitt himself. I know this will be denied. It always is. But it’s a sad fact that Republicans are notoriously blind when it comes to how offensive and insensitive they sound whenever they talk about racial issues.
And, as if to underscore such cluelessness, recently Mitt Romney appears to have put on Brownface to talk to Univision.Many are now saying this is unfair and it’s just a tan, but I’ve personally never seen someone get a tan on their face, but not on their ears or fingers.
“If blacks and latinos show up at the polls, the country is in serious trouble”
So he didn’t say this, and it is nothing but biased interpretation to form false opinions.
Would Romney get more latino votes if he were latino? Of course.
Will the Republican Party be in trouble 90+% of latinos start voting only for other latinos or only Democrats, as blacks do? Of course.
Guess the truth not only hurts, it also causes desparation.
the other MSM sources get a pass because people like you enjoy when the other guy gets the bashing.
No BS KAP, the other cable news outlets get no pass they simply get their facts right much more often than Faux. The other cable news outlets are not as biased as Faux by any conceivable stretch KAP. MSNBC is a distance second on biased news when compared to Faux. Most others are much more objective. For real news try PBS for a month and perhaps you can see what the Faux news cult has done to you.
Joseph why is it the leader in misinformation Faux News channel is not part of the MSM?
Where did I say Fox New wasn’t?
Fox New most definitely is bias. So is NBC, ABC, CNN, Washington Post, Huffington Post, Time, New York Times, and so on.
Above, I linked to a Gallup article from 2011. Gallup today has updated it for 2012:
Americans’ distrust in the media hit a new high this year, with 60% saying they have little or no trust in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately, and fairly.
Americans are obviously seeing right through the bias from both sides.
So, as I said before, it doesn’t appear that Romney’s comments are hurting him despite the mainstream media and Democrats going absolutely bonkers over it.
I trust Rasmussen and Gallup over some news journalist gushing over Obama. The MSM has a love affair with Obama and thank god the majority of Americans don’t trust the media.
Sorry to break it to you Democrats, but Obama’s convention bump has evaporated. The race is tied. Rasmussen has Obama 1 point ahead. Gallup has them both tied at 47%.
We’ll see in November.
Right j2, all the Obama and liberal loving sources are more objective, sure and I have Ocean front property in Arizona to sell you. As I said on one of these forums awhile ago if you want conservative news go to Fox, if you want liberal news tune into all the rest, if you want the truth find out for yourself. I hold little value in any of the MSM including PBS.
Something about this web site makes typos flow from my fingers like no other.
Fox News. News. With an S.
KAP, in the article I linked to you might find it interesting that 26% of Republicans trust the media, 31% of independents trust the media, and 58% of Democrats trust the media.
So, at least according to Gallup, the majority of Democrats trust the media.
Pretty much backs up what you’ve said.
Not a good sign for Obama when 31% of independents trust the media. How are his attacks going to work? Perhaps that’s why Romney and Obama are tied in the polls.
If you want to know whose side the MSM is on, wait until after the election.
If Obama loses, every news outlet other than Fox News will be in mourning. To quote Jon Stewart after the Walker Recall Election:
JON STEWART, HOST: If Fox was high, MSNBC must be M-S-N-B-Sad.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
ED SCHULTZ, MSNBC: To say that I’m shocked and stunned is pretty much an understatement.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
STEWART: “Shocked and stunned is an understatement. No, it feels tonight more like my heart was f—ked by the devil.
(Laughter) No, wait, that’s an overstatement. Tonight I feel somewhere between shocked, stunned and devil heart f—ked. (Laughter) This is Ed Schultz.”
Indeed, MSNBC passed through all the stages of grief last night. Stage one, denial.
If Obama wins, every news outlet other than Fox News will be in gloat-mode. “We won!!!!” There will be a gloat-a-thon.
I look forward to the completely predictable response from the MSM after the election.
How about you?
No surprise Joseph, from all the BS liberals spew from sources like MSNBC, Huff.Post, Muckracker, and a few others that cater to their taste dosen’t really surprise me that Democrats are trusting the Media.
MSNBC is a distance second on biased news when compared to Faux.
Like when MSNBC edited the George Zimmerman 9/11 tape to make Zimmerman sound racist?
Capus confirmed a previous Reuters report that an internal network investigation had determined that a producer made the editing error, and that the network’s editorial controls - including senior broadcast producer oversight, script editors and often legal and standards department reviews of sensitive material to be broadcast - simply missed the selective editing of the phone call.
Two sources at the network told Reuters the Miami-based producer of the segment had been fired on Thursday.
Capus said “several people” involved were disciplined, though he declined to specify the nature of the disciplinary actions, saying they were internal personnel matters.
MSNBC takes the crown for bad news.
Fox doesn’t even go that far.
I wonder what else MSNBC has “simply missed” when reviewing material before putting it on the air?
Who needs the truth when you have a good story to run?
Speaking of Univision and the MSM, these were the comment of the MSM regarding Univion’s questioning of Obama:
The domestic media is kind of shocked here at the questions Obama got.
DIANE SAWYER: “The president, fending off heated questions tonight!”
BRIANNA KEILAR: “He got some tough questions.”
WOLF BLITZER: …”tough questions at a town hall held by Univision.”
PIERS MORGAN: “President Obama facing tough questions!”
ANA NAVARRO: …”some very tough questions.”
SCOTT PELLEY: “Today, he faced some really tough questions.”
These questions come from Jorge Ramos and Maria Elena Salinas, and for the first time in four years, Obama got some legitimate questions! He was actually questioned about his role as president. He was questioned about his performance. He was held accountable for the first time in four years by, of all things, Univision. His answers…he never answered their questions. In fact Obama sounded like a dunce. The questions:
SALINAS: (via translator) Why wasn’t your administration better prepared with more security at our embassies on September 11?
“SALINAS: (via translator) Do you have information indicating that it was Iran, or al Qaeda, who was behind organizing the protests?
RAMOS: (via translator) At the beginning of your governing, you had control of both chambers of Congress, and yet you did not introduce immigration reform. And before I continue, I want for you to acknowledge that you did not keep your promise.
RAMOS: I don’t want it to get lost in translation: You promised that, and a promise is a promise — and with all due respect, you didn’t keep that promise.
SALINAS: (via translator) Mr. President, you have been the president who has made the largest number of deportations in history, more than 1.5 million so far. You’ve separated many families.
SALINAS: (via translator) Some of your critics to say that it was just only to win the Hispanic vote. Why didn’t you do that earlier during your presidency?
ALCORTA: (via translator) Mr. President, I am a student at the journalism school at UM. This is my question to you: What would you recommend to Latina women such as I in order to be successful in my search for employment in the United States?
SALINAS: (via translator) You have supported [Mexican] President Calderon’s policy against drug trafficking. Do you think that after 65,000 deaths it’s time to change the strategy? Can you consider the 65,000 a failure and the policy should change?
OBAMA: Uh, that’s why —
SALINAS: (via translator) How many more people have to die?
RAMOS: Shouldn’t Attorney General Eric Holder have known about that? And if he didn’t, should you fire him?
RAMOS: So if you have nothing to hide, then why are you not releasing papers?
SALINAS: (via translator) Why don’t we have — very briefly — an independent investigation —
OBAMA: (stammering) Maria Elena —
SALINAS: — that is not from the Justice Department?
SALINAS: (via translator) What is your biggest failure?”
I bet Obama almost crapped himself when he was asked these questions. So the big news in the MSM was not the content of the questions that Obama was asked by Hispanic Univision, but rather that Univision had the nerve to ask Obama hard questions. Funny
Gee Frank, no selective editing there.
Okay, here’s your logic, Romney’s comment being left out of the equation: If I tell an ugly truth about somebody to them, it will cause them emotional distress.
Here’s the hole in your logic. Just because confronting somebody with an ugly truth can make them squirm, doesn’t mean anger with what you say implies you’ve hit that kind of nerve.
People also get angry with folks who lie about them, who slander or libel them. Two separate possible causes, and it’s basic logic that P implies Q does not automatically mean Q implies P.
Or put another way, If I said the Senators stabbed Julius Caesar, therefore he is wounded, that logic works. But did being wounded mean it had to be senators who stabbed him? No. If we ran into poor wounded Caesar on the street, knowing nothing else, we could not look at Caesar’s wounds and just say “There must have been Senators who stabbed him!”. For all we know, at that point, it could have been the husbands of the women he was sleeping with.
The actual, real statement you can derive, is that if Caesar was not wounded, Senators certainly didn’t stab him. So, if we were of that odd frame of mind such that we worried about knife-nut Roman politicians, we could reassure ourselves that nothing happened merely by encountering Caesar unwounded on the street.
Oh, by the way, did you know that Romney had to bus in supporters to his Univision Forum, and demanded that he get to retape his introduction?
Oh, did you hear the one about Rush Limbaugh saying our penises have gotten shorter because we’ve let women get liberated? No, I wasn’t making a joke, actually, Limbaugh actually said this.
It could have been much worse. An Coach Factory Outlet examination of the sabotage revealed why government officials Louis Vuitton Belts and computer experts found the attack disturbing.Aramco’s oil production Coach Factory Outlet operations are segregated from the company’s internal communications Gucci Belts network. Once executives were assured that only the internal communications network had Coach Factory Outlet been hit and that not a drop of oil had been spilled, they set to work Coach Factory Outlet replacing the hard drives of tens of thousands of its PCs and tracking Coach Factory Online down the parties responsible, according to two people close to the Coach Outlet Online investigation but who were not authorized to speak publicly about it.Aramco Coach Outlet Online flew in roughly a dozen American computer security experts. By Coach Online Outlet the time those specialists arrived, they already had a good handle on the Coach Factory Outlet Online virus. Within hours of the attack, researchers at Coach Outlet Online Symantec, a Silicon Valley security company, began analyzing a sample of Coach Outlet Online the virus.That virus called Shamoon after a word embedded in its code Coach Factory Outlet was designed to do two things: replace the data on hard drives with Hermes Belts an image of a burning American flag and report the addresses of infected computers Coach Outlet Online a bragging list of sorts back to a computer inside the company’s Coach Factory Online network.Shamoon’s code included a so-called kill switch, a timer Coach Factory Outlet set to attack at 11:08 a.m., the exact time that Aramco’s computers Hermes Belts were wiped of memory. Shamoon’s creators even gave the erasing mechanism a Coach Factory Online name: Wiper.Last May, researchers discovered that Flame had been siphoning data from computers, mainly in Iran, for several years.
What, then, are the characteristics that make an MSA likely to spawn successful neologisms? It’s well established that Coach Outlet Twitter has a higher rate of adoption among African Americans than other ethnic groups, and so it perhaps isn’t Coach Outlet surprising that they now find that innovation centres, as well as being highly populated, have a higher proportion of Coach Outlet African Americans, and that similarity of racial demographic can make two urban centres more likely to be linked Coach Outlet in the influence network. There is a long history of adoption of African American slang (cool, dig, rip off) in mainstream Coach Outlet Online US culture, so these findings agree with what we might expect.Not only has he been sacked, but he now risks losing his Coach Factory Online home as well, situated almost next door to his former workplace, the Papal apartments on the top floor of the Coach Outlet Online Apostolic Palace.The Gendarmerie explained that this was done to prevent Gabriele from harming himself, Coach Outlet and that he himself had asked for the light to be left on at night and was given a sleeping mask.
adies, when you’d like the most beneficial on the designer purse earth, at this time there almost nothing far more great than just a Chanel designer purse. For anyone who is absolutely thinking of purchasing Chanel designer purse, people picked up imagine the amount of collection there may be on the net? youl possibly be drooling above the wide variety of models in addition to colorings connected with Chanel purses and handbags. Category, cheap louis vuitton handbags model in addition to ease usually are several text of which summarize this Chanel distinct finishing touches. Coco Chanel seemed to be some sort of master with women of all ages outfits in addition to gadgets. After you hobby some sort of trendy Chanel designer purse with your adjustable rate mortgage, people age hauling using a very long history connected with women of all ages exactly who appreciate typical model of which extravagant in addition to at ease. On the list of one of a kind reasons for having this Chanel case is usually it is quilted household leather pattern. Though chanel tote bags youl know that Chanel helps make various forms of purses and handbags, many people however provde the typical quilted Chanel case. Most of these carriers usually are tales from the vogue earth. Generally, people louis vuitton leather bags include to visit to some sort of Chanel flagship retail store, or maybe high-end team retail store to uncover Chanel custom made purses and handbags in addition to tote bags, therefore you fork out a reasonably a red cent for every single just one The good thing is, the net delivers many prospects with the vogue intelligent person to uncover top-of-the-line custom made purses and handbags on great buy charges.
training, most of us age conversing Chanel in this article, cheap bags online so that you age however about to fork out a normal selling price, but instead of merely one case, youl have the capacity to invest in a couple of. Gals, you recognize at this time there unlike this model, excellent in addition to ease of real Chanel designer purse. Regardless of ones spirits, at this time there some sort of Chanel designer purse correspond. The item a brainy strategy to search on the net to obtain Chanel designer purse, due to the fact youl have the capacity to uncover many excellent good buys. Put on receive far too overly enthusiastic, nevertheless. Youl wish to be certain people age having solely real Chanel armani watches instead of of which low cost counterfeited material. Prior to invest in, I would recommend checking many carriers to get familiar with what exactly a true Chanel case seems as if. Put on pay for almost any home owner that offers you a unny emotion. What types of Chanel purses and handbags would you invest in on the net? This air this control. Household leather, pelt, wicker, print out, completely new, retro, black color, light, color, reddish colored, environment friendly, violet, lilac, motorola clutch, cheap armani watches drawstring, designer purse, handbag, messenger case, exclusive updates, for example. You actually picked up mature uninterested in your options connected with models in addition to colorings. These days there not any need to have that you dwell all around some sort of Chanel sepcialist or maybe high-end team retail store of which provides most of these special carriers. Another Chanel case is usually fantastically on hand.
You have to do their best in your Louis Vuitton canada goose collection therefore you have the capacity to experience the returns which can be involving checklist canada goose. For those who comply with while in the path of the web canada goose and other (larger) canada Louis Vuitton UK goose enterprises, you add ones canada goose within a evident area to ensure that everyone is able to view as well as, perhaps, ignore it. The following is a thing you can look at at this time when you take the time to still do it. Market your subscription as well as your Louis Vuitton Outlet canada goose giveaway–that free stuff that you need to present. Discover certain how to go about the item, basically publish a bit of pre-sell copy or possibly limited sales copy for the each of them. Set them up because only one little clone and see exactly what do transpire. After that, in
UGG UK lieu of getting the particular canada goose that everyone needs, you’ll be able to set up a little advertisement making men and women need to on just what exactly you have to give. This may not be a technique that you’ll be possibly UGG Boots
quite familiar with. Which kind of canada goose perhaps you’ve developed pertaining to pre-selling; or maybe have you seen that will time period before? Should you are lacking expertise in the definition of, you have to discover the idea as this is a variety of canada goose you’ll want to understand. Preselling is actually copy which isn’t actively promoting whatever
because it is coded in any natural firmness and design. You want to do their best to keep the canada goose out of emotion like getting attempt to bought to be able to after they look at this content. This tends to turn into a problem, it really is more difficult laptop or computer appears to be! In case you are brand-new to help pre-selling, you will understand what we should tend to be talking about soon. Pre-sell backup are often very efficient at relation to its helping wide open your thoughts of your canada goose. It is also very useful in cutting the particular amount of resistance you might get to potential sales replicate.
Dressesstore.net has been in business for more than 10 years, we are a professional US wedding dress and uk wedding dresses manufacturer, and our goal is to provide complete one-stop shopping for all brides, bridesmaids and all special occasion events. We strive to provide you with the most current selection in Mldress, the most complete size range, the best prices and the largest variety of styles. Each style was built around the concept of offering a complete dressok, suitable product assortment for your social moment. Each style includes the product and information necessary to help you create a memorable wedding ceremony or party.you can buy cheap handbags in our store
Easily packable Coach Factory Outlet the president’s majority shrank nationally, he won a larger proportion of Latino and Asian votes Gucci Belt than in 2008. Among Latinos, Mr. Romney’s share of the vote fell 17 percentage points below Coach Outlet Online the 44 percent won by George W. Bush in 2004. Perhaps most ominous, the Latino share of the Coach Online Outlet total vote rose to 10 percent from 8 percent in 2004, and the Asian share rose to 3 Coach Bags Outlet percent from 2 percent. The electorate is now 28 percent nonwhite, more than double the figure Coach Factory Online from two decades ago. That growth is certain to continue; in 2011, births to nonwhites Hermes Belt outnumbered births to whites for the first time. After three days of haggling at a luxury hotel here, Coach Factory Outlet opposition negotiators agreed to the new coalition and then elected as its president Sheikh Ahmad Coach Outlet Store Online Moaz al-Khatib, a former imam of the historic Umayyad mosque in Damascus and a respected national Coach Outlet Store figure within Syria. “Today in Doha is the first time the different factions of the Syrian Coach Factory Stores opposition are united in one body,” said Riyad Farid Hijab, a former Syrian prime minister and Coach Handbags Outlet the highest-level defector from the Damascus government. “So we ask the international Coach Factory Store community to recognize the Syrian opposition as the representative of the Coach Factory Online Syrians. The umbrella organization was designed to subsume the Syrian National Council, a Louis Vuitton Belt previous attempt at unification that has appeared increasingly marginalized as Syria Coach Factory Online has descended into civil war. That group’s authority was undercut when it failed to attract Coach Outlet sufficient support from key minorities, religious and tribal figures, businessmen, and, most Coach Factory Outlet important, rebel units conducting the fighting against President Bashar al-Assad’s forces. The Coach Outlet Store hope among Western countries is that the new coalition, called the National Coalition of Coach Factory Online Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces, can give local opposition councils the Coach Outlet Store Online legitimacy to bring fighters under their Coach Outlet Store Online en supposant que mal.