Obama’s Folly: The Illegal War in Libya

Well, Gaddafi is still alive and kicking — and fighting the so-called Libyan “rebels” to a stand still. Some refer to it as a stalemate, others as a quagmire. No matter what you choose to call it, it is a confounded mess! And it is as embarrassing (as all get out) to the Obama Administration, the political left, the leftist media, and to NATO.

As we have learned, all to often with Obama, rules and regulation — and much of the US Constitution — does not apply seem to him and his cohorts.

For the life of me, I cannot figure out how we missed that little shortcoming of US law. But apparently, we did. And, as a result, Obama just goes ahead and acts as a king would do and issues “commands,” “decrees,” and “edicts.” What’s worse – the Mainstream Media, which lays claim to “watchdog” status for the people, will not call him on it. They just look the other way, totally disregarding illegal and/or unconstitutional actions of the Obama Administration.

If the actions of the Obama Administration in the Libyan war were ever “questionable” it no longer matters. Now they are, under US law – ILLEGAL.

I refer to the War Powers Act of 1973. (You may read the entire act HERE.)

Under the law, Obama had sixty days to report to Congress on his actions involving the US military in Libya. He refused to do so. The Congress must now, by the law, take action.

The most often suggested action is for the Congress to simply cut off funds for US military activities in Libya. But I am betting that the current Congress hasn’t the collective cajones to carry out the law of the land and discipline the President by turning off the money spigot and forcing him to pull US forces and equipment out of that sand dune circus.

In fact here is a little known stipulation of the War Powers act:

“SEC. 5. (c)
Notwithstanding subsection (b), at any time that United States Armed Forces are engaged in hostilities outside the territory of the United States, its possessions and territories without a declaration of war or specific statutory authorization, such forces shall be removed by the President if the Congress so directs by concurrent resolution.”

Don’t hold your breath waiting for it to happen, though. There seems to be a strange shortage of testosterone in the halls of Congress today.

However, it seems to me now is exactly the time for the Congress to order President Obama to withdraw all US military assets out of the Libyan theatre of war. That would include the Hellfire missile equipped drones buzzing around over the Libyan sands. If for no other reason than the US simply cannot afford the cost of such a hair-brained operation.

Look, the painfully plain truth is – we don’t have a clue WHO THE HECK THOSE “REBELS” ARE.

See, the nagging question is -- are we providing military support for Muslims who will, at some point in the not too distant future, turn out to be terrorists training their weapons on the United States of America. I would argue there is more than an even chance that YES, that is exactly the threat posed by those we are supporting today in Libya. Does anyone remember when the US supported the Afghanis against Russia -- only to wind up fighting them today in Afghanistan in a war we have no intention of winning? Does anyone remember that?

If this had been President George W. Bush pulling such a stunt, the mainstream media, Obama’s lapdogs, would be all over him with every issue and every broadcast.

But, alas, the leftist propaganda machine, which IS the mainstream media in America, is so biased it would be laughable if it were not doing so much harm to America.

Have you noticed the reduction in the coverage of the war in Libya by the press? Why, because it has rapidly become an embarrassment to the political left. They cannot risk this folly of Obama to actually taint him in anyway. Heavens, no! The Messiah, the savior of America, must be assisted in obtaining another four-year term in the Oval Office.

Rest easy, you folks in the leftist media. I don’t think you have much to fear from the GOP in the campaign against Obama over the next eighteen months, or so. I say that with great sadness. But it is the truth, as I see it. I am fairly certain America must endure six more years of Obama thumbing his nose at US law and the Constitution with no one willing to oppose him.

Posted by J. D. Longstreet at May 24, 2011 3:33 AM
Comments
Comment #323490

Some people never learn. Post and run isn’t dialog.

It’s like talking because you love the sound of your own voice.

Posted by: womanmarine at May 24, 2011 5:41 AM
Comment #323492

J.D. Longstreet has asked to be removed as an Author at WatchBlog. I am leaving his account intact in case he decides he wants to continue to contribute here.

Posted by: WatchBlog Publisher at May 24, 2011 8:10 AM
Comment #323493

womanmarine, were you as equally upset when Paul Siegel did the exact same thing in the liberal column? And I might add, he did it for years. He would post and run and would never comment on anything that was said. Of course he WAS a liberal and therefore exempt from the rules applied to everyone else.

Posted by: Beretta9 at May 24, 2011 8:55 AM
Comment #323494

Beretta9, I see no partisanship in womanmarine’s comment. No matter your political affiliation, if you are an Author at WatchBlog, you need to follow the rules. And that means:

- when you post an article, you should make a point of reading and participating in the comment threads for those posts
- when you post an article, you need to pay attention to the formatting

Posted by: WatchBlog Publisher at May 24, 2011 9:28 AM
Comment #323498

WatchBlog Publisher


“I see no partisanship in womanmarine’s comment.”

that’s a matter of perspective. B9 is correct in pointing out the paul siegel did the same thing. he posted and didn’t get involved in the ensuing debate. woman marine never once as far as i can remember (and i’ve been posting here for many years) complained about it.

as far as the formatting, i can understand the space constraints, and wanting to allow the other authors posts to get as much exposure as possible.

Posted by: dbs at May 24, 2011 12:36 PM
Comment #323499

dbs,

That was a different time in WatchBlog, under the management of David Remer. Remer is no longer involved in WatchBlog.

I review the comment threads and am taking action when an Author is not fulfilling their obligation to WatchBlog, namely participating in the threads for the posts they create.

The partisan bashing really needs to stop. It’s not needed, nor is it welcome here. It goes against the core mission of WatchBlog and goes against the reasons I created WatchBlog in the first place.

Posted by: WatchBlog Publisher at May 24, 2011 12:46 PM
Comment #323546

Speaking of Obama’s folly; what a gaff in the presence of the Queen of England. I understand not all presidents understand proper etiquette, but you would think his advisers would advise him. Perhaps if he had someone to advise him other than the Chicago goon squad, he might have known. But it was great to hear all the MSM come to his defense. In fact some of the blamed the Queen for obama’s idiocy, LOL

Posted by: Mike at May 25, 2011 3:50 PM
Comment #330330

Bulldogs of art and oakley sunglasses cheap with a smooth edge of attitude for your active lifestyle.Engineered for who understand that style is something you define for yourself oakley sunglasses. So if you need its opinion,the highest quality cheap oakley sunglasses is the best for you! cheap oakley sunglasses continue to make their mark on with discount oakley sunglasses legend grows with each new design of sunglasses and each new world-class athlete who sees the top of his game behind the lenses of our sport sunglasses.100% protection against UV and harmful blue light.welcome to our oakley sunglasses outlet store.find your like at oakley sunglasses discount store.

Posted by: oakley sunglasses outlet at October 10, 2011 10:21 PM
Post a comment