August 20, 2004
peace loving free speech or hit list?
Today we are releasing a list of delegates to the 2004 Republican National Convention. This list includes the names, address, phone numbers, and e-mail addresses of RNC delegates in addition to what hotel each one is staying at during their invasion of New York City.…“The earth is not dying, it is being killed. And those that are killing it have names and addresses.” — Utah Phillips indymedia.org
Ah, the voice of the people. The liberal grassroots. The 'peace' protestors. The revolutionary vanguard. To what peaceful end does the dissemination of this information bring about? The list plus the animus attached to the people on the list does not suggest good and happy things for the people on the list does it?
At the 2004 Republican National Convention, the self-appointed managers of the world will be discussing their party platform of racism, imperialism and the violent suppression of human liberty. They will proudly renominate the unelected president of an illegitimate government. For the past four years, in the United States, we have seen a terrifying increase in racism against Arabs and Muslinms, the passage of the draconian USA PATRIOT Act, handouts to the rich that would make Reagan blush, millions of lost jobs, and an accelerated continuation of the war against the poor and the oppressed. Abroad, the Empire has claimed the stage of history as its own, even ignoring many of its old imperial allies, invaded two sovereign states, started a bogus “War on Terror”, overseen a coup in Haiti, attempted to overthrow the Venezuelan government, overseen, aided, and authorized the brutal and illegal Israeli occupation of Palestine, and generally accelerated and intensified an already belligerent imperial system of domination which threatens the Earth and all its peoples. In short, the violent expansion of this rotten system is on one side, and all of us on the other...Our objectives are to:
- Supply anti-RNC groups with data on the delegates to use in whatever way they see fit.
- Supply a body of information that can be easily added to.
- Encourage the republishing and redistribution of this data.
- Facilitate making local connections. Many of these delegates are involved in politics and business on a town or county level.
indymedia.org
Today's fringe left is fringeing further to the left than ever it seems. Democrats did a good job of avoiding this kind of Al Gore, Kucinich, Michael Moore, Ted Rall, "GOP: drop dead," ranting that has been ubiquitous during the Bush administration. Will the Republican convention be where this seething hatred becomes non-non-violent? I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
While I don't think Kerry would embrace indymedia's hit list, or violence in any form in our political process, how different are the above indymedia statements from the rhetoric of the Kerry campaign and many of his anybody-but-bush supporters? All I'm saying is that maybe the left should think about pulling back the Bush is Hitler, Bush is a liar, fraud, unelected, proto-dictator, and fascist rhetoric before someone goes too far with it and actually acts on the environment of hate and negative emotion created by such statements.
President Bush has governed in a dishonest fashion, trampling values on every issue except fighting terrorism and leaving voters "clamoring for restoration of credibility and trust in the White House again," John F. Kerry and John Edwards said in an interview.Posted by Eric Simonson at August 20, 2004 04:05 AM"The value of truth is one of the most central values in America, and this administration has violated" it, Kerry said in an interview with The Washington Post aboard the Democrats' campaign plane Friday. "Their values system is distorted and not based on truth."
The Democratic nominee and his running mate said it was that kind of anger toward the president that prompted entertainers at Thursday's Democratic fundraising concert in New York to attack Bush as a "cheap thug" and a killer. "Obviously some performers, in my judgment and John's, stepped over a line neither of us believes appropriate, but we can't control that," Kerry said. "On the other hand, we understand the anger, we understand the frustration."
Edwards said scathing anti-Bush attacks such as the concert and Michael Moore's new film "Fahrenheit 9/11" reflect an "expression by folks with genuine feelings," adding, "Thank goodness in our country they have a right to express those feelings." washingtonpost
Eric said, “All I’m saying is that maybe the left should think about pulling back the Bush is Hitler, Bush is a liar, fraud, unelected, proto-dictator, and fascist rhetoric before someone goes too far with it and actually acts on the environment of hate and negative emotion created by such statements.”
Good advice Eric, but, you did not go far enough. We need to ask the right to pull back on the Kerry is traitor, marxist, socialist, GI killer rhetoric and the Nader is socialist marxist, isolationist, Jew Hater, rhetoric from the right as well.
Posted by: David R Remer at August 20, 2004 04:20 AMI’ll have to look into the Nader socialist/marxist charges. There might be something there, but yeah, the rest is probably partisan fluff.
Posted by: Eric Simonson at August 20, 2004 04:36 AMDavid, Are you really posting comments at 4:20am? It’s only 1:30 where I am no matter what your server says.
Posted by: Eric Simonson at August 20, 2004 04:38 AMThat’s an interesting link, Eric. I didn’t see “violence” mentioned anywhere, and the rhetoric was directed at Democrats as well as Republicans,
…do not misinterpret us, we do not view the Democratic Party as an opposition party, but rather as another side of the same coin.With this in mind we are encouraged by the mobilization in Boston against the Democratic National Convention, and the massive mobilization planned for New York City against the Republican National Convention.
And you seem to imply that “Facilitate making local connections. Many of these delegates are involved in politics and business on a town or county level.” has some sinister implication. I have no idea who these IndyMedia guys are, but is it possible they are encouraging constructive dialog at the local level?
Hey Eric, I promise I’ll stop comparing Bush to Hitler, stop calling him a oppressive dictator, stop calling him a deserter, stop calling him a bloodthirsty warmonger, stop calling him a cokehead, and stop generalizing all Republicans as fascists… if you promise to stop suggesting Kerry faked or lied about his war record, stop calling him a communist sympathizer, stop questioning his patriotism, and stop generalizing all Democrats as socialists.
For what it’s worth, I’ve never actually done any of the things I’ve promised to stop doing. I don’t exactly fit your Pacifica-inspired image of the “angry left”.
-Cf
To all:
Aww hell, its no fun to stop. Go ahead and continue with the insinuations, the generalizing, the pandering, and the political and verbal gamesmanship.
But lets DO stop the namecalling—its just juvenile.
Lets also use ALL the information available to develop opinions, rather than only that information which helps our particular side.
Lets also retain a healthy objective curiosity that allows us to understand where the other side is coming from, whether we agree with their position or not.
And finally, lets continue to have fun, continue to use our written skills to joust, and to treat each other with respect ( though not so much respect that we cant jab at each other).
But lets NOT stop!!
Posted by: joebagodonuts at August 20, 2004 11:51 AMIf these guys seem to have the same problem with us, Eric, it’s no use blaming us for them. I just wonder why you see fit to react to what every single nutjob left of center says as if all democrats or liberals feel that way.
Should I tar you as a freeper, a militia sympathizer, A card carrying member of the John Birch society? No. I’m content with calling you a Neocon, a designation you obviously fit. You might as well call me a liberal.
My advice? Quite meditating on the greivous plight of a party that controls all three branches of government.
Posted by: Stephen Daugherty at August 20, 2004 01:27 PMAP, Stephen,
I didn’t see “violence” mentioned anywhere, and the rhetoric was directed at Democrats as well as Republicans,If these guys seem to have the same problem with us, Eric, it’s no use blaming us for them.
But they didn’t release the names and addresses of DNC delgates and suggest that they ‘visit’ the delegates. And they aren’t calling Democrats ‘killers of the earth’, or racists, imperialists, and brutal dominators.
Should I tar you as a freeper, a militia sympathizer, A card carrying member of the John Birch society? No. I’m content with calling you a Neocon, a designation you obviously fit. You might as well call me a liberal.
Freepers are not the same caliber of people that these indymedia folk are. In fact the Free Republic founder lives in my city. He’s actually an average guy.
What I am pointing out is that they are representing you whether you like it or not. David had a post back on August 7th, “GOP, Racist party still,” where some racist/socialist nutjob who doesn’t even claim to be a Republican, is somehow representing the Republican party. The indymedia crowd is actually representative of the left. They are using the same arguments, and using the same rhetoric. If they are such nutjobs doesn’t this bother you?
Posted by: Eric Simonson at August 20, 2004 01:55 PMEric, yep, had a well drilling contractor with a 4 inch blade and lengthy stories about his bar fights, get all kinds of upset when I called him on sabotaging one of my well pumps to increase his income. He angrily said he was coming back. Had to baby sit my property last night with a .357 magnum. Sheriff said if he doesn’t show within 24 - 48 hours, he probably won’t. So, perhaps I will get some sleep tonight. He is a Bush supporter, what can I say? :-D (Just kidding… well, I mean he is a Bush supporter, but, no, there are millions of Republicans who are not crooks, and like Nixon, they are adamant about it. — I had to tie this into politics.)
“I’ll have to look into the Nader socialist/marxist charges.”
I guess we both have a sense of humor.. that’s good! There is hope for this country yet!
Posted by: David R. Remer at August 20, 2004 02:19 PMName calling aside; publishing the names and home addresses of any group of people is aggressive and an invasion of their privacy. There are plenty of violent people out there and it only takes one to vandalize someone’s house or attack someone’s little girl in the name of a greater cause. In the very least, it gives burglars the addresses of people who probably will be out of town. It is a fascist tactic, meant to intimidate, and those who do it should be ashamed and perhaps help personally liable.
Posted by: Jack at August 20, 2004 04:08 PMWhen you’re a Republican, it’s okay to release the name of a CIA agent, but not a delegate.
Posted by: entertainment news at August 20, 2004 07:12 PMGreat reading tonight! Fun that both sides can shoot jabs and have fun disagreeing (and in some cases just not admitting to the other maybe being a just a little bit right) But I agree with Jack. Giving out personal addresses & phone numbers is crossing the line. Especially in todays world.I vote “hit list”
Posted by: averagejoe at August 20, 2004 10:52 PMCould it be reasonably argued that delegates are public persons who should have contact information that is widely available so that both their supporters and opponents can contact them and express their thoughts, wishes, and concerns? I realize that security is an issue in this day and age, but I personally oppose the idea that secrecy and security are synonymous. I think that if the delegates are not safe with this information publicly available, they never really were safe, they merely had an illusion of security that has now been shattered and must be replaced by the real thing.
Posted by: Jarin at August 20, 2004 11:18 PMThe Kerry camp cannot avoid the fact that he visciously lied about Vietnam to congress in order to build a political resume.
Posted by: T.E. Darby at August 22, 2004 12:10 AMEric, I’d say these people were dead wrong to do what they did, but you’re not going to be able to make me feel guilty by such distant association. I’m not going to support people who support such intimidation.
Posted by: Stephen Daugherty at August 22, 2004 01:29 AMDavid,
Sorry to hear about your contractor. I prefer a shotgun for that kind of work. Less aiming in the dark and all. Too bad I don’t live nearby I would have come and sat with you. That’s what neighbors are for in my mind.
Posted by: Eric Simonson at August 22, 2004 02:28 AMThe Kerry camp cannot avoid the fact that he visciously lied about Vietnam to congress in order to build a political resume.AM
The Kerry Camp has not avoided the issue of his testimony before congress. They have confronted it head on. Kerry did not lie, and I’d like to see you prove that contention. I’d like to see how far you can get in denying what happened there. There are many historical sources to back Kerry.
So, if you have proof these things happen, a solid case to present, then do so. I’ll be waiting.
Posted by: Stephen Daugherty at August 22, 2004 06:11 PMHow does this differ from releasing names and addresses of abortion providers by those on the right; those on the list to be gunned down?
Posted by: V. Edward Martin at August 22, 2004 06:50 PMV. Edward: Well, one difference is that the anti-abortion group’s infamous list specifically encouraged people to go out and kill everyone listed.
-Cf
Posted by: Christopher Fahey at August 24, 2004 08:32 AMWhy is the Republican Party using the “do not call” list to promote their candidates? I live in Ohio and we are getting daily calls asking us to vote for Bush or other Replucian candidates. We have been on the “Do Not Call” list since October of 2003….and they are the ONLY ones breaking the rules. They won’t get our votes THAT way..but then they wouldn’t have gotten them anyway.
Posted by: S. Riffle at October 13, 2004 10:08 AM