September 26, 2004
Love Amid the Ruins: A Modern Parable
This is my attempt to put the Kerry-Bush debate into human terms…
Not too long after the first "rat incident", my husband came up to me with a serious look on his face. "Honey", he said, "We've got a real problem. You know that broken-up stretch of sidewalk down the street? Well, there's a gas main running underneath it."
"So?" I asked "That hasn't been a problem so far, has it?"
"No", he replied, "But I'm afraid that one of the rats will chew into it, and then create a gas leak--and you know what that will lead to. We're talking mass destruction. I want to get the Homeowners Association together right away and work out a repair plan. This is a grave threat!
"Well", I said, "In that case, you've got my support. If it's dangerous, do whatever it takes to get it fixed. But - can you be sure about the gas main?"
"Trust me", he replied. "I hear finding the gas main will be a slam dunk.
A day after that, I woke up to find two guys tearing up the sidewalk, working a backhoe and a pneumatic drill. My husband was in the living room, practising his putting. "That was fast!" I told him. "You must have really laid it on the line to the Homeowners Association."
"Well", he admitted, "I didn't actually convince them...but I figured we ought to take on the problem anyway, ourselves."
Well, hubby's never been great at sticking to a budget, and dollar signs flashed through my mind as I listened to the drilling outside. "Can we afford that?" I asked.
My husband didn't seem worried. "Honey, emergencies like this are why people invented credit", he replied. "And don't worry - I know what I'm doing. Jobs like this are in my blood!
"And who needs the Homeowners Association, anyway. You don't want the safety of our home determined by decisions made by that screwy French couple down the street, do you?"
Well no, I guess not. But a gas leak threatens everyone - shouldn't they pay their share?
Once the work started, I couldn't believe how fast that crumbly, unsafe old sidewalk came up. When the last piece of concrete was loaded into the dumpster, I took out a pitcher of lemonade to them and invited them up to the porch for a break. The Backhoe Guy was a tall thin fellow, who reminded me a bit of the guy that played the scarecrow on the Wizard of Oz. The Drill Guy looked more like the cowardly lion.
"You guys really know your stuff." I said. "Looks like the job's just about finished."
"Oh no, ma'am." said the Backhoe Guy "There's a lot more work to do. See, there's a lot of stuff under a sidewalk--what we call 'infrastructure'. Stuff like water pipes, oil pipes..."
"...sewers...", broke in the Drill Guy.
"...right, and electrical conduits---and that's all got to be working before we pour a new sidewalk and go home."
"Well, won't that be pretty easy to do, now that the old sidewalk's removed?" I asked.
"Actually," said the Backhoe Guy, "that old sidewalk, nasty as it was, was at least covering the infrastructure up, and protecting it from vermin. So we've got to be careful about how we get all the infrastructure rebuilt, and keep everything protected while we're doing that, or we could end up with a real mess."
Vermin, I thought. Since the rat incident I really don't like vermin. "What sort of vermin?" I asked.
"Rats." replied Backhoe promptly. "You end up with a messy, muddy hole, and it attracts rats. Also mice, roaches-"
"-frogs, locusts..." suggested Drill Guy.
"Well anyway", I interrupted, "How long will the rest of the job take?"
Drill and Backhoe exchanged glances. "Well ma'am," answered Backhoe after a pause, "it's hard to say, with the just the two of us. Usually you'd have a bigger crew for this. I mean, you need a plumber, electrician, civil engineer..."
"...union rep, lawyer..." interrupts Drill Guy,
"...plus guys like us to stretch tarps, run fencing..." continues Backhoe
"...move in a porta-potty, build scaffolding ..."
"I think I get the picture." I tell them. "Tell me, does my husband know about all this? I mean, that we need a bigger crew?"
Drill and Backhoe exchange another glance, then look out, together, across the street. My husband's gotten out a tripod and camera, and is taking shots of himself climbing on the backhoe, wearing a borrowed hard hat and a T-shirt that said "Mission Accomplished!".
Another pause.
"We told him." said Drill Guy.
So, Drill Guy and Backhoe spent the next few days looking for that gas main, fixing up the 'infrastructure', and trying to keep the whole thing covered and 'secure' so it wouldn't turned into a rat-infested mud pit. A couple of neighbors even pitched in. And for a while, it seemed like things were going ok....sort of. I mean, they were working really hard, and this had to be a pretty tough job. But one thing they hadn't done was find that gas main.
Over dinner one night, my husband came out with some surprising news. "Well, honey" he said, "It looks like there isn't a gas main under that sidewalk after all".
"Uh - say again?" I asked.
"Don't feel bad - everyone makes mistakes", said one of the kids.
"Look", said my husband, "This wasn't a mistake!. There's no gas main, but I'm not the only one that thought there was. And isn't it great to have gotten rid of that dangerous old sidewalk? I mean, my Dad tripped up on that sidewalk back in the 90s. That sidewalk was trying to kill him - it tried to kill my Dad!
"Come on, Honey," he continued, "You said I had your support when I started this. Wouldn't you have still given it, knowing that there was no gas main?"
I hate hard questions: people so seldom take the time to listen to the answers. And the kids were watching, and I had a funny feeling that whatever I said, Drill Guy and Backhoe were going to hear my answer. Do I want to tell them, in so many words, they've been wasting their hard work?
"Look, I would have supported you", I said. "You're the head of the family, after all, and you needed all the ammunition you could get, to drum up support for the job with the Homeowners Association. And the sidewalk needed to go sometime. But--I would definitely not done everything the way you've done it, Dear. For starters, I sure wish you'd managed to get the Homeowners Association involved more. The last time we repaired with that sidewalk, it wasn't nearly as expensive."
After that, a few more weeks went by. It seemed like every evening and weekend was spent messing with that darn sidewalk job, and things just seemed to be getting worse, not better. There were places so dangerous, muddy, and rat-infested that no-one dared go there. The neighbors were more annoyed at us than anything, and even started to talk about the job being illegal. And then I found out that my husband had gotten a report that said that things were bleak, but hadn't told me, and also that almost no work had been done on the 'infrastructure', because of all the vermin problems.
So eventually, I got a little angry. "Look." I told me husband one day. "I've got to tell you that I'm not entirely sure that the way you're handling this sidewalk job is, well, exactly the best way that one might approach the job."
In reply, I got a glazed look. "Too much nuance and complexity in your language there, honey. Try and be more direct."
"Ok, I'll simplify." I told him. "I'll be real, real clear. What you're doing is wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong. It's so wrong, I think 'Wrong' must be your middle name. This is the wrong job, at the wrong time, for the wrong reasons. It's so wrong, I think you should be off the home repair detail permanently. This job is putting us in debt, spending money we could put to better use elsewhere, and it's distracting you from that other, really important job you started and never finished." That glazed look again. "What other job?"
"Don't you remember the rat incident?" I asked. "When that big sneaky rat, the rat from the trash bin, the one that we called 'Bin Rat', got into our house sometime, knocked over your tower speakers, and caused $3000 in damage? Your important job was to catch Bin Rat!"
"Oh, that" he said. "I don't think that's so important any more. I truly am not that concerned about him.
"But if you're worried about rats - hey, we're doing great with rats! we're fighting loads of rats on the sidewalk job! and isn't it better fighting them outside than here in out living room?" "Sure", I said, "but how do you know that fighting them outside is actually keeping them away from our living room? maybe you're just attracting more rats with that muddy mess of a sidewalk job."
Another glazed look. Sometimes, a question can just be too complicated to answer.
"Ok, if you're so smart", he said, "Tell me what you'd have done differently."
"Everything." I told him.
"Ok, look" he said. "You told me I had your support when I started, right?"
"Well, yes." I agreed.
"And you even said you'd have supported this job, even if you knew there was no gas leak, right?"
"Not exactly", I said. "You're taking me out of context. I did support you then, but expected that you'd get help with the job, like you said you would. And, frankly, I didn't expect that you would screw this up so badly that-"
Yeah, yeah", he interrupted, "you're always going on about how I take you out of context. The point is, first you say yes, then you say no! that's just like a woman! how can I take your advice seriously if you're always flip-flopping like this!
"Face it", he continued, deepening his voice, and thrusting out his chest and chin, "major repairs are no place for people that can't make up their minds! Flip-flopper!"
Right, like he's never changed his mind?
"Well, if I'm a flip-flopper", I tell him, "You're a pig-headed idiot that refuses to take advice or admit he ever made a mistake!"
(And now the happy ending...)
"Don't say it like that", he replied, smiling winsomely, compassionately, and sincerely. "Actually, I'm decisive and resolute. And I make unpopular decisions."
Well, that was just too much - what's a girl to do? I took down my hair, tore open my bodice, and flung myself into his arms, my snow-white bosom heaving with passion. "Oh George", I sobbed on his shoulder, "You're right. You are so decisive and resolute! Please say you'll stay with me, and do my home repairs forever and ever! or at least another four years!"
"No problem" he replied. "In fact, I have big plans for the house too---I think we should switch to a flat roof."
Posted by William Cohen at September 26, 2004 02:29 PMWhat a great story! Thanks, William!
-Cf
Posted by: Christopher Fahey at September 26, 2004 03:35 PMWell, well, you spent all that time, and effort to put forth the democrat side of this question? Nice job, but you still missed the one burning question, we are there now, so how is kerry going to do any better? Answer, he can’t!, and you know it!
Kerry’s only experience with war was so long ago that I doubt he remembers how to load a rifle. So people, let’s do the right thing, stay the course, protect our nation, as well as my grand children (and yours), and finish this thing!
Could I do better? No, but neither can a man who would cut and run! Good grief, can’t you see that the enemy is waiting for this? We canno’t afford to give them the edge in any aspect of this war, or we will pay the consiquences!
The musulem extremest’s do not care whether your a democrat for kerry, and peace, they want you dead! For once, see the reality of our foe’s, and understand what Isreal has been going through since 1948. If you waver, they see it as weakness, if you run, they will attack, if you elect kerry, we are finished!
Tom
Posted by: Tom at September 26, 2004 07:05 PMWell, well, you spent all that time, and effort to put forth the democrat side of this question? Nice job, but you still missed the one burning question, we are there now, so how is kerry going to do any better? Answer, he can’t!, and you know it!…
Could I do better? No, but neither can a man who would cut and run!
For starters, you’re either trying to be deliberately misleading, or else you’re very poorly informed. Kerry has never advocated we “cut and run”.
I don’t think “will Kerry do better” is the right question. You Bushies seem to like this argument, and usually follow it up with “it won’t help much just to get the French involved” or some such. The beauty of your argument is that no, Kerry doesn’t have a quick fix to Iraq. Nobody does. It’s a mess, and getting out of the mess will take a lot of time, money, and probably a little luck, no matter who’s in charge.
The question I’ve got is, given then long series of mistakes that Mr Mission Accomplished has made to put us in this hole in the first place, and the vast array of opportunities for further mistakes in the future, can the country afford another four years of his leadership?
Posted by: William Cohen at September 26, 2004 08:44 PMTom, your comments are funny because the Bush Administration are the ones who are considering the “cut and run” option, not the Kerry team. Kerry’s never even considered such an option. Have you not been reading the news?
Bush got us into this mess in the first place, and now he’s seriously considering an equally reckless plan to cut-and-run to get us out. Kerry wouldn’t have made all those mistakes in the first place.
-Cf
Posted by: Christopher Fahey at September 26, 2004 10:19 PMChristopher, Kerry promises what his campaign calls “massive troop reductions” in Iraq within six months. This isn’t even considering a cut and run?
This is not a partisan observation— as I see it, you can read Kerry’s promise in one of four ways. I don’t know which is correct.
1). He really IS going to honor his promise and pull out of Iraq in six months whether the job is finished or not.
2). He believes that the Europeans are going to reverse themselves 180 degrees and agree to replace the troops he withdraws.
3). He believes (but isn’t admitting it) that Iraq is stabilizing under Bush’s leadership and the problem will just solve itself if he waits six months. In other words, he’s optimistic about the course Iraq is currently on and thinks we’ll be able to significantly reduce troop levels in six months (which, incidentally, Bush is also saying).
4). He really does think Iraq is unsalvigable but is just making a promise he doesn’t intend to fill and is going to keep the current number of troops there anyway.
Personally, I think it’s number 3, with 4 running a close second. Option 1 would be political suicide, and if Kerry’s elected he’ll probably want a chance at a second term. Option 2 is science fiction, and I give Kerry enough credit to think he’d never actually believe such a thing.
Tom, your comments are funny because the Bush Administration are the ones who are considering the “cut and run” option, not the Kerry team. Kerry’s never even considered such an option.
Tom, I just want to second that. Kerry has never said he’s going to cut and run. Hell, we’re the guys complining that Bush didn’t throw enough troops in there to start with. And how come al Qaeda is still functioning? That’s the good fight. Not this Iraq nonsense.
Bush is in a big hurry to get out of Iraq. Not surprising, really, since nation building has always been anathema to conservatives anyway.
Kerry promises what his campaign calls “massive troop reductions” in Iraq within six months.
Martin, you’ll have to provide a link to that. I googled kerry + “massive troop reductions” and nothing came up.
Kerry said “significant” troop reductions predicated on the ability to get NATO troops in there to replace them.
1) Kerry never promised to get us out of Iraq in 6 months.
2) I think Kerry’s plan to attract international troops to some degree is highly likely. And he’ll definitely do better at it than Bush who is seeing his coalition allies continue to reduce their troop numbers.
3) Not only is Kerry not admitting Iraq is stabilizing, he’s facing the fact that it’s getting worse. And Kerry is not going to reduce the overall troop levels until the job is done - unlike Bush.
4) Whatever.
#2 (given a Kerry victory) is the most likely scenario.
3). He believes (but isn’t admitting it) that Iraq is stabilizing under Bush’s leadership and the problem will just solve itself if he waits six months. In other words, he’s optimistic about the course Iraq is currently on and thinks we’ll be able to significantly reduce troop levels in six months (which, incidentally, Bush is also saying).
Amazing! I’m planning my vacation to Fallujah now!I have an extra ticket Martin,want to come along? Don’t worry if I don’t meet you at the airport, I may have to take a later flight.
Posted by: Greg at September 27, 2004 07:12 AM> Christopher, Kerry promises what his campaign calls
> “massive troop reductions” in Iraq within six months.
> This isn’t even considering a cut and run?
Only if every one of them is replaced by an internationally ally. Read the not-so-fine print, Martin. Kerry has on more than one occassion suggested that the overall troop number needs to increase, which is a sort of honesty that you will never hear from the lips of President Bush.
Options #1 (unilateral pullout) and #3 (the situation is okie-dokie already) are preposterous. I know you didn’t think Option #3 was preposterous, but it is. Option #4 (do nothing), well, as AP says, Whatever.
Regarding Option 2, well, there are more countries in the world than just Europe, but yes, I suspect that with the opportunity to compete for reconstruction contracts, even France and Germany might be persuaded. Perhaps some existing allies will increase their force. Or at least be convinced not to bail out, as Bush’s coaltion allies have been doing. At least Kerry says he’s going to try.
Joe Galloway summarized America’s real options quite succintly, in a way that doesn’t particularly favor Bush or Kerry:
We have prosecuted the war and the counter-insurgency war that followed with too few soldiers on the ground and seemingly no strategy for victory. Today, there are three options:
—> We double the number of boots on the ground, from today’s 150,000 troops to 300,000, and pursue a much more vigorous attack on the foreign and domestic guerrillas. To double the force would require a major buildup in our Army and Marine troop strength, which no one seems prepared to pursue.
—> We continue as we are now, holding defensive positions and taking a steady stream of casualties while the insurgents get stronger and bolder.
—> We get out.
My take on these scenarios is this: Which candidate has been the most honest and the most accurate in their assessments of the situation on the ground so far, and about the costs (in dollars and lives) America will have to pay for the effort? (Kerry, hands down) Which candidate has been favoring minimal committments all along, and leaning the most towards the idea of a cut-and-run withdrawal? (Bush, hands down)
-Cf
PS: By the way, what I really liked about the parable above is the fact that there is no analogous character for Saddam Hussein. He and his WMD’s are just a volatile and dangrous gas pipe. The personalization of the Iraq War was one of the biggest mistakes made by the Bush Administration and the American people who supported them: Making the war into a question of whether or not a single man ‘deserved punishment’ rather than about whether or not the war would make the world safer.
Posted by: Christopher Fahey at September 27, 2004 07:43 AM