September 24, 2004
No Islam or Cats Allowed
Will someone pinch me and help me wake up? I am having this nightmare about our government running amuck and keeping people out of this country because they disagree with some of its policies. Did we actually authorize it to behave this way? Is this the action of a government by and for the people in this nation today? Are we that afraid of a singer who no longer sings because his faith in Islam will not allow him to do that any more?
This is a man who has disavowed any actions of terrorists publicly and privately and was a peacenik by anyone’s history of our times. One of his songs “Peace Train” remains a favorite of people who believe that peace is to be preferred to war. What is happening here, have we all gone insane?
I am appalled at our government’s casual use of its virtually unlimited power these days. If you are Islamic and visible about that practice you are likely to be on someone’s watch list. Expulsion, even if you are a citizen is now possible. The prospect of punishment being visited on you if you wear a beard is higher than at any time since Vietnam faded into history. We are being led into fear and, foolishly, we are following the bullies and misfits in charge because they tell us they can protect us better than any nice guy could. That kind of leadership is always available but not easy to get rid of when you tire of it and the people who impose it on you. If you didn’t learn that in the schoolyard then the price gets higher as you get older. Now the price is thousands of lives in Iraq, ours and theirs. That price can easily grow into tens of thousands and even millions of lives on both sides if we keep pursuing this course that we are on today. Islam is not our enemy yet but we are surely working toward making it the enemy that replaces Communism.
There is a peaceful way out of this mess in Iraq, but it will take time to implement it. It is based on our leadership having at least the modicum of integrity that saying what you mean gives you. Plain and simple we need to communicate like we are really in touch with what is happening in the real world. When we were struggling in Korea we admitted it and negotiated an end to the war like adults do when no further prospects of real gain exist in pursuing a war. When the guerrilla tactics of the Vietnamese who were fighting against us had defeated our tactics and we were losing more than we were winning. Then we finally left the Vietnamese nation at long last to the Vietnamese people. We are going to have to do the same thing eventually in Iraq.
It will take different leadership to get us out of Iraq than it took to get us into this new mess. This is a real prospect today; we are a few percentage points from making a change in this election that would help us get out sooner. Kerry does not have to defend some of the mistakes that Bush has hanging around his neck. That will leave him more room to maneuver if he wins this election. If Kerry loses this election, the midterm election will change the congressional makeup and put a different face on our international policies. It will do that by using that tool of our democracy that has been so quiescent during Bush’s first term, the Senate and House. Many of the Republican Senators are losing faith in Bush and even if he wins another term it will not give him the blank check that he has had since 9/11. Republicans will lose the Senate in 2006 and may actually lose the House too.
Republicans are as frightened as Democrats of some of the policies pursued by this Administration that spends like there will be no tomorrow. They too fear the just retribution of the mass of people in this country that will be visited on the Republican Party if the Bush policies bankrupt Medicare, destroy Social Security and continue to erode our position in the world outside our borders. They too fear the day that will come if our dollar grows too weak to be the basis currency of world trade and our balance of payments deficits finally come home to roost. Not all of the people on the right side of the aisle in the House and the Senate believe as Bush apparently does, that the “Rapture” is coming soon. They recognize that the raptor flying overhead could become a vulture if we continue on the course set for us by the Neocons and Bush.
Meanwhile the indignities heaped on the musician and peace worker formerly known as Cat Stevens do not help our cause which is to win the minds and hearts of people around the world. Since this Administration behaves like a schoolyard bully it tries to strike fear into their minds and hearts. It has succeeded here at home but the rest of the world is full of disdain, disgust and disregard for us now. It will take decades to undo what they have done to our good name in the world. Four more years will make it worse and greatly enhance the chance that these “wanta be” Cowboys will lose their economic future and ours to the Indians and Chinese. They are losing our jobs today without so much as the recognition that they are being taken right out from under their noses. In fact the Bush approach to governing hands jobs over with a smile and a handshake. Nothing makes the Republicans as vulnerable as four more years of this type of leadership in the White House, Democrats should pray for Bush to win. Then he will be a Lame Duck and vulnerable to the evidence of his mistakes which are legion. God bless and preserve you from the Cats and Islam’s of the world, Oh that’s right Bush is doing that on his behalf, never mind. ©Henri Reynard/GoldenBrush Interactive
Posted by Henri Reynard at September 24, 2004 07:40 AMDishonesty or are you just not aware of the facts? It’s odd that nowhere in your analysis do you mention Mr. Islam’s financial support for Hamas or the Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman (who was involved in the first World Trade Center bombing).
But shouldn’t a harmless artist be allowed to come and go as he pleases? Why not ask Mr. Islam that same question. As a “moderate muslim” he enthusiastically supported the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini death sentence and fatwa against the author Salman Rushdie. He’s just another “moderate muslim” for murder, and it’s deeply dishonest to spin keeping a character like this out of our country as some threat to civili liberties.
Mr. Islam (aka Cat Stevens) fell off the peace train years ago, and is now riding the jihad train.
Martin, the person in question has stated with regard to your first accusation that
I want to make sure that people are aware that I’ve never knowingly supported any terrorist groups - past, present or future. It’s simply an attempt to cast doubt again on my character and good intentions
And as for your second accusation, it is not, as far as I know, a crime to voice support for any cause. That is unfortunately the price we pay for living in a democracy.
You maybe surprised to find that Jack Straw, Foreign Secretary of the US’s most important allie in the “war on terror”, was unhappy with the action.
The Foreign Secretary raised the Cat Stevens incident with Colin Powell and expressed concern that this action should not have been taken
And just to top it all off, a spokesman for the Muslim Association of Britain was of the opinion that
This incident comes only to confirm the farcical and ultimately draconian standards and practices exercised by U.S. immigration authorities
I think he maybe closer to truth than you care to admit.
Posted by: Bob Hope at September 24, 2004 12:29 PMOn one hand he gives his support for death fatwas against authors, and then wants us that he’s just a peace-lovin’ sixites hippy who would never knowingly support terrorism when he gives to “charities” run by Hamas? What a joke.
Of course it’s not a crime to celebrate and support death fatwas from ayatollas. I mention “Cat Steven’s” loathsome behavior in this regard only to question his I’m-just-a-peace-loving guy BS.
And frankly, what the Muslim Association of Britian has to say about anything is no different that what Osama or al-Zarqawi says.
Posted by: Martin at September 24, 2004 12:39 PMI don’t claim to know what Cat Stevens did or didn’t do, what he believes or supports, but I can say that some of the things Martin says give me the willies.
“And frankly, what the Muslim Association of Britian has to say about anything is no different that what Osama or al-Zarqawi says.”
So, are you saying you have inside information that connects the Muslim Association of Britain with terrorist acts, or are you saying what it sounds like you’re saying, which is that Muslims are all terrorists? Be honest, this is for posterity.
Posted by: Alejo at September 24, 2004 02:41 PMAlejo, no inside information is required.
The MAB has its roots in the Muslim Brotherhood, a well known Egyptian terrorist organization with connections to Ayman al-Zawahri (Osama’s number two man). Their stated goal is to transform England into a Muslim state. That’s why anything they want to say about American immigration policies should be deeply supected.
And no, I know full well that all muslims aren’t terrorists (only those who believe and follow the words of the Koran are).
Posted by: Martin at September 24, 2004 05:02 PMImagine that 19 Catholics crashed planes into buildings killing thousands. Imagine also that they did this in the name of Jesus. Imagine that fundamentalist Christians celebrated in the streets. Imagine that the Pope and the Church leaders said that while they condemned the violence, they understood the rage Christians felt about having their religion marginalized in the modern world and that before the U.S. took aggressive actions to counter the terror, it should address the roots of this rage that it had caused by supporting modern ideas about the roles of religion and women in today’s world. Imagine that the authorities found links to terror networks in churches and when they moved to question the priests involved they were accused of bigotry and profiling. It is hard to imagine, isn’t it? Wouldn’t you expect outrage from American and British Catholics against terrorists who take the name of the Lord in vain?
If you were a prominent Catholic, would you support the Pope if he wanted to murder an author for criticizing Jesus? People like Martin Scorsese (“Last Temptation of Christ”), the Monty Python people (“Life of Brian”) and most people associated with Saturday Night Live or Comedy Central would be long dead under the Cat Stevens rule. The media criticized Mel Gibson for implying that non-Christians might go to hell. Cat (peace train) Stevens advocated sending people there earlier than the Lord had intended. This is no peaceful hippie done wrong. Now I’ve been crying lately, thinking about the world as it is. Why must we go on hating, why can’t we live in bliss.
Has anybody stopped long enough to find out why Christians and Muslim Extremist want to fight each other? It’s a 4,500 year old story over the right to religion and civilization.
Posted by: Henry Schlatman at September 25, 2004 05:31 AMIt always fascinates me that for a couple of religions that promote peace, Islam and Christianity has caused more death in the history of man. The Crusades, the Dark Ages and now this terrorism. People seem just to kill in the name of God. I wonder if the world would be better off becoming atheist?
Aldous.
Posted by: Aldous at September 25, 2004 04:14 PMTurns out it was a clerical error. He’s allowed here after all.
Those of you who defended the decision: What do you think now?
-Cf
Posted by: Christopher Fahey at September 27, 2004 03:49 PM