June 09, 2004
Dear John
Dear Honorable Senator John McCain,
I sincerely hope that since recent reports have raised the specter of a Kerry/McCain Presidential ticket, that you’ve received many letters as the one I now write. It is now 1 week and a day since Richard Clarke’s revealing 60 Minutes interview, and the resulting events of this past week have compelled me to request of you, yet another extraordinary act in service to your country.
In my forty years as an American citizen, we have faced crisis, battles and pivotal moments that have tested the very foundation of our union. Yet, with able leadership, both Democrat and Republican, our resolve has been rooted in our triumphs and failings - and, the lessons learned.
In 2000, I watched your Presidential candidacy from across the political aisle with respect and admiration. We are at odds on many issues, but had you won your party’s nomination, I would have strongly considered voting for you.
So, in 2004, many Dems (like me) saw in Gov. Dean what the GOP foolishly rejected in ’00. Like you, he energized not only the party’s base, but also others across this country now demanding truth, competence and equal representation.
It was encouraging and revealing when the extent of your close relationship with John Kerry came to light, as a result of your facing down the unjust criticism he faced - even from your own party.
Your outspoken candor, non-partisan civility and admonishments of your party’s abdication of core Conservative principles, has been met with the same derisive dismissal shown our allies and the U.N., by the current administration. But, as radical as it may sound (although you will never admit it out loud), there is one certainty that we would both agree upon.
That is, in spite of the many differences on major issues, if you were to reach across the political spectrum in a bi-partisan effort to put this country back on the right track, you will not only answer the earnest call for your leadership, but more importantly, you can begin the dismantling of a polarized and divided nation -a necessity in the face of an uncertain future.
Only once in this country’s history has a two party Presidential ticket been attempted. And, not surprisingly, it was in the midst of the greatest crisis a country could endure – The Civil War. Although, the Lincoln/Johnson term would end in tragedy and scandal, history only has reverence for their victory in salvaging our union.
I firmly believe that this nation is now facing a crisis of similar peril. Yet sadly, as we near one hundred and forty years since the end of the Civil War, once again the wound is self inflicted by those among us whose arrogant intent is to force their brand of governance on a disparate society, never imagining they would resist.
An administration devoid of clarity, pragmatism, and accountability, while stubbornly refusing to engage others of contrasting visions, cannot represent our dominant form of democracy, as we are already graded on a small margin of error.
I will leave you with a quote from former President Harry S. Truman, on leadership:
'Men make history, and not the other way around. In periods where there is no leadership, society stands still. Progress occurs when courageous, skillful leaders seize the opportunity to change things for the better.'
Posted by Bert M. Caradine at June 9, 2004 06:33 PMWe don’t need McCain, since we’ve got quite a few excellent picks to choose from… but I sure would love it if they could somehow work it out. Who isn’t a big McCain fan?
Posted by: Gaelen Burns at June 9, 2004 08:13 PMGaelen:
What about McCain do you like so much? Just curious.
Posted by: joebagodonuts at June 9, 2004 08:48 PMEloquent appeal, Bert. I don’t agree McCain is as impartial and non-partisan as you allude to, but, he has demonstrated an ability to put his political party pressure aside in order to stand up to and by a few policy issues that he believes are far more important to our nation than political spin would have us believe.
I do however see a kind of healing of the gash down the middle of corpus U.S.A that could begin with a Kerry/McCain ticket that would not occur with other tickets like Kerry/Nader or Dem./Dem.
Some of my great regrets for such a ticket however, would be no movement on overhauling the Fed. Elections Commission or the Commission for Presidential Debates, and no movement for (third parties) and the majority of unrepresented eligible voters who have no demonstrable affinity for either of the two major parties, Dem.’s and Repub.’s.
Posted by: David R. Remer at June 9, 2004 09:41 PMI think there is a danger that a Kerry/Dean ticket might fuel increasingly popular claims that democrats and republicans are really two sides of an oppressive establishment promoting the status quo.
Posted by: Jarin at June 9, 2004 10:16 PMErr… wow, that is a hell of a slip… I meant Kerry/McCain ticket in that last post. Apologies to both gentlemen for the mistype.
Posted by: Jarin at June 9, 2004 10:19 PMJarin: That is exactly WHY I want to see a Kerry/McCain ticket. The political system in this country has grown stale. There are plenty of people to vote AGAINST, but nobody worth voting FOR. Dems are running an anti-Bush campaign instead of a pro-Kerry one, just as the GOP ran anti-Clinton campaigns for years.
We need a political shake-up in this country. Something that will either (a) wake up the parties to the reality that they no longer represent the people, or (b) wake up the people to the same reality.
Unfortunately, though, I consider a Kerry/McCain ticket to be a fool’s dream. McCain has too much to gain by staying where he is. The GOP is starting to reject Bush, and, if McCain stays put, he could easily find himself on the Republican ticket in 2008.
Posted by: Rob Cottrell at June 10, 2004 09:30 AMRob,
You express two sentiments I also agree with. John McCain and Howard Dean are the only prominent political figures of my generation that come close to the icon aura of a Bobby Kennedy or ML King.
And yes, my plea will fall on deaf ears, as McCain has much to gain from a Bush defeat in November - maybe.
Do you think the Conservatives, with all their power, money and control over the GOP, are just gonna hand over the reins to the McCain-ites just because Bush went down the tubes? McCain would need a power base in the party to accomplish a takeover - a group that never surfaced in ‘00.
What is to prevent a scenario of the quickly installed and coronated Bill Frist, maintaining the status quo status of the rebel McCain, within the party?
Posted by: Bert M. Caradine at June 10, 2004 11:39 PMDems are running an anti-Bush campaign instead of a pro-Kerry one
That’s just not true.
While I respect McCain’s integrity, and most other things about the man, his views are entirely too conservative for the Dems.
Posted by: Mike K. at June 14, 2004 01:52 PM
