Democrats & Liberals Archives

December 17, 2003

Redefining Our Nation

Participation in the great debates of our time like most times in history is not restricted to those who tell the truth. The Bush administration lies so effectively that a majority of the people in this country still believe that Saddam Hussein had a direct connection to the events of 9/11 2001. Of course it is true that there was never any evidence of any link and much evidence to the contrary, but the lie still stands. Now in an attempt to turn reality on its head once more and defy the evidence of our senses it is clear that the voices of the right have come up with another entire new lexicon. They have now redefined the Bush team’s ineptitude at diplomacy as candor, an amazing twist of sensibilities that makes buffoons into master strategists and liars into those who would uphold the truth at any cost. The amusement level would be rising if so much were not at stake in these matters of such vital import to the women and children of Iraq to say nothing of the men.

Our sanctions killed five hundred thousand Iraqi children before the war. In our attempt to set things right with a war in Iraq several thousand more perished. They died largely from diseases that would be treated in most nations in the world, and they are continuing to die. It is all very well to say that those deaths are the product of Saddam’s beastliness but he was the product of our CIA coup in the first place. You see the interconnectedness of things like imposing governments of horror on other people and human deaths from our foreign policies are impossible to eradicate with a redefining of words. Our leadership in this nation is raping the world and the benefits are falling less and less to the people, even those in our nation, and more and more into the hands of a few very rich corporations, and the people who run them. Bill Clinton stands accused in that Dock alongside Ronald Reagan, Bush Senior, Bush Junior, Richard Nixon, Lyndon Johnson and others throughout our history.

It is hard to admit that our beautiful nation could be destroying lives at such a pace and most of us do not care to know those facts about our wealth. Our wealth is maintained on the backs of poor people around the world and our consumer society is a crime against humanity. The final stages of growth in a society of excess are now clearly coming before us. The economic warfare that we have inflicted upon the world in order to have the exclusive rights to their oil and gas and tin and other items of value is now in its final stages. We have tried to rebuild the world in our image of man as the consumer instead of human beings as the loveliest creation of a glorious God and we are failing. Oh yes, China is following the path of capitalism, but they have demonstrated quite adequately that freedom has nothing to do with the creation of wealth through capitalistic endeavor.

Basic freedoms and rules of law on which our nation was founded are being reduced and demolished daily by our current government in the name of perpetuating our dominance over the oil of the world. We are running low on natural gas to heat our homes and prices are rising in spite of this administration’s dedication to keeping fuel prices as low as possible. It is on cheap fuel and cheap food that our empire is founded and the entertainments on our TV that give us vacuous gratuitous pleasure and the illusion of a circle of friends. We, some of us, in embracing wholeheartedly this illusion of connection love those people we have never met more than our own children and grandchildren.

There is still a great and powerful spirit of freedom and love of democratic institutions in our land and even the fear of terrorists promoted by our leadership has not snuffed it out. There are still a lot of people in our nation who care more about children everywhere than they do about owning a second car or driving a Humvee. That they have been badly led cannot be doubted. Whether they will awaken to the fact that their very real power in the world outside our borders is being squandered and abused is still an open question. You see, it is not the depravity of our leadership that should define the nation but the open and loving minds and hearts of its great people.

We have been distracted by the effort required to build our homes and our families even in this richest of nations. We have for too long ignored the fate of people in the rest of the world due to our government’s intervention in their lives. Indonesia, one million and more of his own people killed by a ruthless dictator who handed out contracts to our multinational corporations like party favors and put a lot of the money they paid in his family’s and his crony’s bank accounts. Iraq, over a half million children dead because of an embargo that lowered their life expectancy while accomplishing nothing to weaken the dictator that we had installed years before. The count continues, remember this when you are reading or listening to those lulling lies of pundits from the right and left both. In spite of 9/11 we are seldom the victims in this world and terrorism is not our greatest enemy. It is complacent ignorance of what our government is doing on our behalf that is our greatest enemy in the vast and powerful nation that we live in and love. I love it no less than you for all of my recognition of its failings and problems and will continue to work to change it. God bless and keep you all safe in this time of our redefinition.

Posted by Henri Reynard at December 17, 2003 08:31 AM
Comments
Comment #4505

Henri, nicely put. To elaborate on two points, first, I believe that the most pressing political issue of our times is how to encourage and build a stronger civil society, so that the compassion we currently show for family and friends has a broader expression in the rest of our intricately connected world. It is most difficult, in our isolation, to imagine that our concern for those quite removed from our daily lives is of any consequence.

Sites like www.MeetUp.com are most important in this regard, leveraging the power of the internet to facility face to face interaction and hence bonding between strangers.

Secondly, and relatedly, the principle obstacle to a more just and sustainable world is not capitalism per se, which has proven itself enormously effective at allocating resources. Nor is it the concomitant greed associated with capitalism, which greed is ineradicably human. It is the abdication of the great majority of citizens to take seriously a responsibility to appropriately constrain capitalism, so that the good of society and the health of the planet takes precedence over the maximization of profits. Strengthen the bonds of civil society, and this abdication will self correct.

Posted by: Norlyn Dimmitt at December 17, 2003 11:39 AM
Comment #4510

I’m really concerned that your series of articles presuppose a utopian set of choices which are not and have not been before us.

Should we have just allowed Saddam to take over Kuwait and Saudi Arabia rather than go to war with him?

Wasn’t the reason we had to deal with sanctions because of the ill-advised decision to leave him in power instead of finishing the war that he started?

By the way when you say ‘our sanctions’, I presume you mean the UN sanctions.

Since you are arguing against both sanctions and force as methods of restraining Saddam, may I suppose you have some as-of-yet unvoiced method for restraining Saddam in mind?

By the way, it is not at all clear what change you propose in general. Are you proposing that we withdraw into a shell from which we never or rarely attempt to influence other nations? Or are you suggesting merely that we ought to influence other nations in a different direction than we have in the past? If you want to influence in a different direction, I really hope you will be willing to realize that the US (and the West) is not omnipotent. We deal with choices less restricted than many nations, but we still have restricted choices.

As for CIA installation of Saddam, I am unable to find much historical support for the contention. Even in sources that are quite frank about CIA involvement in Iran (say wikipedia), I see very little evidence that the CIA was particularly involved in installing Saddam. I would be surprised if they were totally hands-off, but I the charge that they were involved enough to have ‘installed’ Saddam or the Ba’athist party seems to be a bit over the top.

Posted by: Sebastian Holsclaw at December 17, 2003 01:38 PM
Comment #4517

sebastian:

they are the CIA…do you really think they would document or make public their activities? if so please provide a link because i have a few questions about JFK that they might be able to clear up….

…the photo of Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam was quite nice….

Posted by: rob at December 17, 2003 06:30 PM
Comment #4519

If you want to believe all sorts of nefarious things about the CIA you can of course do so. But for purposes of discussion we can’t stray too far from facts or else the discussion turns into an impromptu role playing game.

Posted by: Sebastian Holsclaw at December 17, 2003 07:04 PM