September 16, 2003
The Polls are in: It's split down the middle!
After reporting on some numbers in my recent post “Revisiting Public Opinion” and Mike Van Winkle’s subsequent post “The Unscientific Nature of Poll Reporting” I found a great Washintong Post poll covering a wide range of political topics.
The good thing about this poll is that it’s just numbers up for interpretation. I’m not planning on giving the numbers any spin, instead letting the math part of my brain take over for the leftwing part of my brain for this post.
Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling his job as president? Do you approve/disapprove strongly or somewhat?
---------Approve--------- --------Disapprove------- No
NET Strongly Somewhat NET Strongly Somewhat opin.
9/13/03 58 35 23 40 27 14 2
9/27/01 90 70 20 6 3 3 4
4/22/01 63 33 30 32 16 16 5
The article actually covers a wider range of numbers, but I selected these to show the beginning, peak and end of the poll's numbers. As you can clearly see Bush has fallen dramatically since his astronomical numbers around 9/11. This was to be expected. Not even FDR himself could have maintained such numbers. The reality is Bush hasn't lost any major ground since his pre-9/11 numbers and sits with 58% approval as of the most recent poll.
What is apparent is that there are 11% more people out there who strongly disapprove and 7% less who approve only somewhat. As you can see from the above numbers people aren't being swayed from "Disapprove Somewhat" to "Disapprove Strongly", since that can only account for 2 of the 11% increase in the "Disapprove Strongly" category. This can only mean one thing: the majority of the people who have been swayed into the "Disapprove Strongly" category were once in the "Approve" section of the above table. But, before you get too excited note that Bush's "Approve Strongly" category has gone up 2%. One to some more numbers.
2. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bush is handling (ITEM)?
Approve Disapprove No op.
a. The economy 42 56 3
b. The situation in Iraq 52 46 2
c. Education 56 39 6
d. Social Security 43 46 11
e. Prescription drug benefits
for the elderly 35 54 11
f. The environment 51 42 7
g. The cost, availability and coverage
of health insurance 32 61 7
h. Homeland security 63 32 4
i. Taxes 48 48 4
j. The federal budget 38 57 4
k. The situation between Israel
and the Palestinians 46 43 11
l. The US campaign against terrorism 70 27 3
m. Creating jobs 39 55 6
n. International affairs 53 43 4
o. Military spending 60 39 2
p. Gun control 51 34 15
q. The abortion issue 43 40 18
r. Campaign finance reform 44 41 15
*Half sample asked items a-i, other half asked j-r.
Now I've thrown a lot of numbers at you in the above table, but I think this is a good summation of how things are right now in public opinion. Bush's approval rating is below 50% in 10 of the 18 hot topics above. Out of the remainder his approval rating is above 55% in 4 of the 8 topics he has higher than 50% approval, which could mean that the remaining 4 topics between 50 and 55% could swing votes either way depending on how they are handled in the election.
Not surprisingly two of those topics are international affairs and the situation in Iraq (the other two being gun control and the environment). As we know those two topics will be significant in 2004 and whomever wins on those topics may very well win the election. The area in which Bush is greatly ahead of the game is the "War" on Terrorism. Depending on the Democratic candidate Bush could lose a lot of ground in this area. For example, Bush would have a difficult time saying he is better equipped to run a War than Wesley Clark (who has yet to officially enter the race, but most likely will this week).
No matter what side of the race you are on you have to admit that the numbers are close and, in the end, could go either way. Things the Republicans have to watch out for are public opinion on Iraq (if more voters become disenfranchised with the situation is could mean trouble), the "War" on Terrorism (if voters begin to think it's going nowhere) and the economy (where 56% of voters already disapprove). Democrats will need to focus on the same three areas, but find a way not to just bash Bush, but rather promote their own plans as better ideas.
As far as I can tell I'll be staying up late in November of '04 watching another close race.
Posted by joestump at September 16, 2003 09:29 AMYou have to take in account the nose dive the Bush numbers took after the oil war is dropping off even faster than his dad. All in all things are looking good for the Democrats in 2004.
Posted by: Jake of 8bitjoystick.com at September 16, 2003 04:09 PM I am sending this message because of what I see as a potential hazard in US politics. The Bush administration has been loosing popularity as its disastrous policies are being felt. The fear card has proven successful , however, in the past Congressional elections and it can be used again by fomenting another enemy,— N, Korea, Syria, Iran, Hammas, or an act of terror directed at the US. Once an enemy image is created and military response is underway, they can garner votes needed for the next election. At present the US military is stretched thin by the costs of occupying Iraq. As those costs mount the bellicose threats to other countries have subsided. If the 87 billion in mostly military assistance is approved, the Bush administration would be able to afford another ‘timely” military incursion and hold on through the next election. This administration has not given us reason to believe that truth is a a major factor in the designation of threats and of enemies, nor that fairness in elections will determine outcomes. They must not be given this license to continue the policies that will produce endless war. Please let Truemajority send your message.
thanks
Marc Pilisuk, Profesor Emeritus
University of California
I think bush should be impeached immediately and chirac should take his place.
Posted by: Josh rogers at September 20, 2003 09:21 AM